Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Abstracts O-3

Additional data from the KEYNOTE-859 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer

Wyrwicz L. 1 Oh D. 2 Weber P. 3 Bai Y. 4 Ryu M. 5 Lee J. 6 Rivera F. 7 Alves G. Vasconcelos 8 Garrido M. 9 Shiu K. 10 Fernandez M. Gonzalez 11 Li J. 12 Lowery M. 13 Çil T. 14 Cruz F. 15 Qin S. 16 Yin L. 17 Bordia S. 17 Bhagia P. 17 Rha S. 18 Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea Universidad de La Frontera, James Lind Cancer Research Center, Temuco, Chile Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain Hospital Nossa Senhora da Coinceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom IMAT-Oncomedica, Montería, Colombia Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland Health and Science University, Adana City Hospital, Adana, Turkey Nucleo de Pesquisa e Ensino da Rede São Camilo, São Paulo, Brazil Cancer Center of General Hospital of Eastern Theater of PLA, Nanjing, China Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

The phase 3 KEYNOTE-859 study (NCT03675737) showed that adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy significantly improved the primary endpoint of OS (median 12.9 months vs 11.5 months; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87; P < 0.0001) and the secondary endpoints of PFS (6.9 months vs 5.6 months; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85; P < 0.0001) and ORR (51.3% vs 42.0%; P = 0.00009) compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-negative, previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The safety profile of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was as expected. To further characterize the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in KEYNOTE-859 and explore the potential influence of subsequent therapy on outcomes, we did a post hoc analysis of time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line therapy or death from any cause (PFS2).

1579 patients were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo given IV Q3W for ≤35 cycles; all patients were to receive investigator’s choice of 5-FU + cisplatin or capecitabine + oxaliplatin. The HR and associated 95% CI for PFS2 in the ITT population were calculated using a Cox regression model with Efron’s tie-handling method stratified by the randomization stratification factors of geographic region, PD-L1 CPS, and choice of chemotherapy. Data are from the interim analysis (03 October 2022 cutoff).

After a median study follow-up of 31.0 months (range, 15.3-46.3), 355 (44.9%) of 790 participants in the pembrolizumab group and 369 (46.8%) of 789 participants in the placebo group received ≥1 subsequent systemic anticancer therapy. The use of specific therapies was well balanced between arms; 339 (42.9%) in the pembrolizumab group and 346 (43.9%) in the placebo group received chemotherapy, 137 (17.3%) and 138 (17.5%) received a VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor, 66 (8.4%) and 72 (9.1%) received a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, and 92 (11.6%) and 96 (12.2%) received other systemic anticancer therapy. Median PFS2 was 11.2 months (95% CI 10.5-12.2) in the pembrolizumab group versus 10.0 months (95% CI 9.2-10.5) in the placebo group (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85).

Results of this post hoc analysis suggest that the benefit of adding pembrolizumab to first-line chemotherapy is maintained when evaluating PFS2, which has a similar HR as PFS. These data further support pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as a new first-line treatment option for locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

NCT03675737.

Medical writing support provided by Melanie Leiby, an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

M. Ryu: Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo, Daehwa Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Daehwa Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca. F. Rivera: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Lilly, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, MERCK-Serono, AMGEN, Astellas Pharma, SANOFI, MSD, BMS, SERVIER; Research grant / Funding (self): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Lilly, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Eisai, MERCK-Serono, AMGEN, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, BeiGene, SANOFI, MSD, BMS. K. Shiu: Honoraria (self): Merck, Merck KGaA, Daiichi-Sankyo; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Roche, Mirati Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck, Roche, Astra Zeneca. M. Lowery: Advisory / Consultancy: Astra zenica, Servier, Roche. S. Bordia: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: MSD, MSD, MSD; Full / Part-time employment: MSD, MSD, MSD. P. Bhagia: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Merck & Co., Inc.; Full / Part-time employment: Merck & Co., Inc.. S. Rha: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen, Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly, Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD, BMS/Ono, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Source Journal
Annals of Oncology
E ISSN 1569-8041 ISSN 0923-7534

References

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement