Skip to main content
Poster P-138

Retrospective analysis of management of BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer in a single institution

Background

BRAF V600E mutation is estimated to be present in 5-20% of all new diagnosis of metastasic colorectal cancer, in which allocates a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 6-8 months in several retrospective studies in the literature. Encorafenib-cetuximab takes a stance in second-line treatment of this population, increasing their overall survival up to 9,3 months accoding of the BEACON study, after progression to a front line.

Methods

We realized a retrospective, unicentric study, from January 2020 to December 2022, of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastasic colorectal cancer and the sequence of their treatment. Demographic data were collected from their medical record: type of chemoteraphy, adverse events, end of treatment and time of death. Demographic and survival analysis were realized with IBM SPSS Statistic 27.0.1.0.

Results

Fifteen patients were included in our study, 8 women and 7 men, with a median age of 63 years-old. Primary tumor was right-side in 3 patients and left-side in 12 patients, Apart from BRAF V600 mutation, 20% of patients present TP53 mutation, and 33,3% of them high microsatellite instability. At diagnosis, 80% patients were at stage IV (26% peritoneal metastases, 26% liver metastases and 13% lung metastases). Front-line treatment was a triplet combination chemoteraphy (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine and bevacizumab) in 40% of patients, and doublet combination (without bevacizumab) in 46% of them, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8,2 months. The combination was well tolerated with neuropathy grade (G) 2 as the most frequent adverse event (AE). Second-line treatment choice, in 53,3% of patients were encorafenib and cetuximab, 5-fluorouracil-irinotecan-bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-bevacizumab) in 33,3%. PFS of patients treated with encorafenib-cetuxumab was 9,9 months. This option was well tolerated, with rash G2 in 20% of patients. Nine patients received a third-line treatment, 33,3 % of them with encorafenib-cetuximab, 22% of them with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab, and the rest of them with FOLFIRI. PFS of ptients treated with encorafenib-cetuximab in this period was 10,4 months. At the end of follow-up of this study (December 2022) 9 patients were still alive and under treatment and 6 of them were already dead.

Conclusions

Our study emphasizes the poor prognosis of BRAF V600E-mutated metastasic colorrectal cancer, In our population, similar as the one in the BEACON study, the combination of encorafenib-cetuximab stands out as a well-tolerated option in second line, with a PFS of 9,9 months. Of note, in our experience encorafenib-cetuximab could also be a remarkable option in third-line setting, with a PFS of 10,4 months.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Valladares-Ayerbes: Advisory / Consultancy: merck, amgen, bayer, servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: merck, amgen, roche, bayer, servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Source Journal
Annals of Oncology
E ISSN 1569-8041 ISSN 0923-7534