Optimizing Skin Grafting Using Hair-derived Skin Grafts: The Healing Potential of Hair Follicle Pluripotent Stem Cells
A man in his 60s with recurrent venous leg ulcers (VLUs) presented with an 18-month history of a VLU on his medial left leg measuring 59.3 cm2. He had been treated with multi-component compression bandages without significant decrease in ulcer size. Given the ulcer’s size, refractory nature, and history of recurrence, the authors sought to optimize the patient’s healing.
Abstract
Background. A man in his 60s with recurrent venous leg ulcers (VLUs) presented with an 18-month history of a VLU on his medial left leg measuring 59.3 cm2. He had been treated with multi-component compression bandages without significant decrease in ulcer size. Given the ulcer’s size, refractory nature, and history of recurrence, the authors sought to optimize the patient’s healing. Methods. Approximately 23% of the total wound was treated using punch grafts (PGs) harvested from different locations on the body based on hair density using the “stick and place” method. Results. One month later, a 56% reduction in ulcer size was observed, especially in the area that received hair-bearing skin. Conclusion. Punch grafts from hair-bearing skin are a viable source of follicular stem cells and may be superior to PG from nonhair-bearing skin for the treatment of chronic wounds.
Introduction
A male patient in his 60s with recurrent venous leg ulcers (VLUs) presented to the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine with an 18-month history of a VLU on the medial left leg. The VLU measured 59.3 cm2 as determined by photo-planimetry (Figure 1).
Methods
Approximately 23% of the total wound was treated (13.6 cm2 of 59.3 cm2) using punch grafts (PGs) harvested from different locations on the body based on hair density. Area A (posterior aspect, 6.7 cm2) received hair-bearing skin harvested from the scalp. Area C (anterior aspect, 6.9 cm2) received nonhair-bearing skin, confirmed with the aid of dermoscopy, harvested from the upper back. The area in between, Area B, was not grafted (center of wound, 7.4 cm2) and served as the control. This area was injured using the same technique required for the grafting technique to assure “needling” the wound was not causal in improvement
After local anesthesia injection, PGs were obtained with a 2-mm punch biopsy and introduced using the “stick and place” method.1 Briefly, a slit of 4-5 mm of depth was created with a 14-gauge needle, and concurrently the PG were inserted into the slits with fine-tipped forceps. Areas A and C each received 20 grafts from the hair-bearing and nonhair-bearing donor sites, respectively (final PG density: 2.9 grafts/cm2). Area B was punctured with the 14-gauge needle without graft placement. The ulcer was then covered with petrolatum gauze, a foam dressing, and a multicomponent compression system and changed weekly.
Results
The scalp and back donor areas healed in 1 and 2 weeks, respectively. One month later, the authors observed a 56% reduction in ulcer size, especially in the area that received hair-bearing skin. The difference was more striking after 6 weeks, when the area A wound size decreased by 91%, while total wound size decreased by 73% (Figure 2).
Hair follicles (HF) are a major reservoir of adult pluripotent stem cells (SC) and are important for re-epithelialization during wound healing.2 Upon acute wounding, bulge SC migrate to the epidermis to aid the rapid re-epithelialization of wounded skin.1 Tissue derived from hair-bearing skin has been utilized in wound management as cultured epidermal sheets from outer root sheath keratinocytes,3 dermal grafts,4 and leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 6+ follicular SC.5
Jiménez et al2 published a hair-grafting technique for VLUs that significantly reduced ulcer area as compared to the ungrafted control; however, healing was not compared to skin receiving nonhair-bearing skin grafts.
Discussion
In the described patient, the advantages of using donor hair-bearing skin included rapid healing of donor and recipient areas, absence of visible scarring, and the ability to be performed as an outpatient procedure. Although the authors attempted to harvest complete HF, many grafts did not contain the lower portion. Given the predominance of SC in the HF upper portion, this probably would not affect efficacy. While the authors aimed to harvest only nonhair-bearing skin from the patient’s back by using dermoscopy, they did not confirm histological HF absence; therefore, there is a possibility that the PG on the patient’s back contained some HF, but in lower density.
Conclusion
In sum, PGs from hair-bearing skin are a viable source of follicular SC and may be superior to PGs from nonhair-bearing skin for the treatment of chronic wounds.
Acknowledgement
The authors are indebted to Aliette Espinosa, CCRP for her technical assistance.
From the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Hair Transplant Institute Miami, Coral Gables, FL; and Clinica Mediteknia Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Address correspondence to:
Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD
Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery,
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine,
1321 NW 14th Avenue, West Building, Suite 504
Miami, FL 33125
rkirsner@miami.edu
Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.