Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

News

Calif. Firefighters to Drone Operators: Stay Out of Our Way

Henry K. Lee

July 22--There's no denying a drone can capture gripping footage of an inferno.

Last year, as flames ripped through a massive Mission Bay apartment complex that was under construction, an amateur San Francisco photographer launched a small quadcopter outfitted with a GoPro camera from within a crowd of gawkers straining for a view a few blocks away. The overhead images were stunning -- and garnered thousands of views on YouTube.

"Incredible," wrote one online commenter.

But such drone flights -- whether for sport or for money -- have become a problem for firefighters trying to battle California wildland blazes with their own aircraft, according to officials. This week, two state legislators announced they had drafted a pair of bills that could lead to increased fines and jail time for drone scofflaws, while allowing firefighters to destroy wayward devices with impunity.

They pointed to the latest dustup, on Friday, when firefighters said sightings of nearby drones delayed helicopters from dropping water on a Southern California blaze that jumped a freeway and burned homes and cars. They said helicopters and air tankers could be disabled -- or even crash -- if drones end up in their flight path.

In the past month alone, camera-equipped drones have hampered aerial firefighting in half a dozen cases across the state, officials said.

Internet sensations

The bills cast a spotlight on a powerful technology with still-emerging rules and ethics. After remotely maneuvering the four-propeller devices that weigh just a few pounds high above a fire -- or a surf break or any other breathtaking site -- drone operators put together videos, some accompanied by dramatic music, that can garner hundreds or thousands of hits online.

"This is maddening, and I can't believe that hobby drones are risking people's lives to get videos on YouTube," said state Sen. Ted Gaines, R-Rocklin (Placer County), who authored the two drone bills with Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Los Angeles.

"Drone operators are risking lives when they fly over an emergency situation," Gatto said. "Just because you have access to an expensive toy that can fly in a dangerous area doesn't mean you should do it."

One of the bills would increase fines and introduce the possibility of jail time for drone operators who interfere with firefighting efforts. The other would grant immunity to any emergency responder who damages or destroys a hobby drone in the course of a firefighting, air ambulance or search-and-rescue operation.

Although airplanes and helicopters are much larger than the drones, anything that gets in their way could spell trouble, officials said. The air crews already have enough to deal with, such as aiming their drops of water or fire retardant, maneuvering through smoke, and avoiding treetops and power lines and each other.

The last thing they need to deal with, said officials, are unmanned devices with unpredictable flight paths -- and operators they can't talk to or even see.

Daniel Berlant, a spokesman for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, noted that bird strikes, long a hazard of aviation, involve "soft tissue and feathers."

Collision concerns

By contrast, "when you're putting a piece of metal and hard plastic into our engines and into our rotor blades, it's got a lot of potential to do some pretty good damage. It can not only cause damage to the aircraft, but it could easily cause the aircraft to crash. It could cause a midair collision."

Berlant said, "Our message is simple -- if you fly, we can't."

Ian Gregor, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, said wildfires are no place for drones. Even if there's no temporary flight restriction in place, he said, "a hobby aircraft would have to be operated so it wouldn't interfere with any manned aircraft, which basically precludes any unmanned aircraft operations around a fire area."

Several TV stations in the San Diego area have expressed interest in working with the state to use drones to capture fire images, but nothing concrete has been set up, Berlant said.

In the Bay Area, KPIX recently featured drone footage during a broadcast, but there are no immediate plans to continue using the device -- and certainly not at a wildfire, a station official said.

Fire officials have an unlikely ally in their mission to clear out drones -- Jason Bross, a quadcopter operator known on YouTube as "jayzaerial."

He posted dramatic videos last year of the Sand Fire near Lake Tahoe. Set to evocative music, his camera skimmed over the treetops and provided a perspective no one else had. The online comments came quickly: "Very nice shot, what type of a camera are you using?" one person wrote.

But another person, who self-identified as a nearby resident, wrote that families had only minutes to evacuate and that any action that could hinder firefighters was irresponsible.

Angry reaction

"If you were the drone operator that interfered with the Sand Fire operations," the commenter wrote, "I hope charges are filed."

In an interview Tuesday, Bross, 38, of Shingle Springs (El Dorado County) acknowledged that what he did "was stupid" and said he had a simple message for fellow drone pilots seeking to film fires: "Just basically, don't even do it."

"I would never do it again, and I hope the message would come across to all the other drone pilots out there," Bross said. "Obviously, it's been happening recently. If any drone is going to be in the way, and you can't find the owner, it should totally be taken down. I think you have every right to shoot it down or get rid of it."

Berlant said that on Friday air operations were suspended by 15 to 20 minutes because five drones were aloft during the initial stages of the 4,250-acre North Fire, which jumped Interstate 15 in San Bernardino County, destroyed seven homes and left 44 vehicles charred, smoking hulls. A task force is calculating how much additional damage was caused by the delay, Berlant said.

Jason Lam, who operates AeriCam Flying Camera in San Francisco, said he can see how alluring it is for drone operators to get so close to the action.

"They think it's cool, to have the coolest footage, but you have to realize what's happening," he said. "If you're preventing firefighters from getting there, it's a no-no."

Henry K. Lee is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: hlee@sfchronicle.com

Twitter: @henryklee

Copyright 2015 - San Francisco Chronicle

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement