Stage IV Perineal Pressure Ulcers in Immobile Patients Treated With Surgical Flap Closure Augmented With Cryopreserved Placental Membrane Containing Viable Cells
Abstract
Introduction. Surgical closure of late-stage pressure ulcers (PUs) poses challenges in the immobilized population due to the high rate of complications, including infection, dehiscence, and recurrence. Muscle flap closure is the standard treatment for chronic, late-stage (stage 4) PUs, characterized by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel as full-thickness tissue loss with exposure of bone, tendon, or muscle. Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes associated with the use of a cryopreserved placental membrane containing viable cells (vCPM) graft for the augmentation of surgical flap closure in nonhealing perineal ulcers. Materials and Methods. Four paraplegic patients (2 men, 2 women; average age, 61 years; range, 44–77 years) with stage IV PUs (ischial, gluteal, and sacral areas) with a mean duration of 4 years (range, 0.5–10 years) received muscle flap closure augmented with vCPM. Following surgical debridement, vCPM was placed between the wound bed and muscle flap closure prior to skin closure. Patients were kept offloaded in fluid-air beds for 6 weeks followed by a gradual return to mobilization. Results. All 4 patients achieved complete wound closure in an average of 7 weeks (range, 6–8 weeks) without complications or recurrence. All patients demonstrated complete take of the muscle flap and maintained their closed wounds for an average follow-up of 12 months. Conclusions. Preliminary clinical results indicate vCPM supports surgical wound closure of chronic perineal PUs in immobile, high-risk patients. In an effort to decrease postoperative recovery time and reduce complications, vCPM may be beneficial for patients undergoing perineal muscle flap closure.
Introduction
Stage IV pressure ulcers (PUs) around the perineum, including ischial, sacral, gluteal, and trochanteric ulcers, develop as the result of prolonged pressure, shear, moisture, and/or frictional forces. When pressure increases due to external forces, localized ischemia occurs, resulting in tissue damage and potential necrosis.1 Risk factors include impaired circulation, immobilization, malnutrition, and incontinence. Infections often occur in these wounds and may lead to the development of osteomyelitis, necrotizing fasciitis, and sepsis. This is especially detrimental to the immobilized/paraplegic patient with comorbidities. In these patients, PUs are hard to treat by surgical intervention because of their impaired potential for postoperative healing.2-4
A flap or muscle closure is a standard treatment option for chronic, late-stage (stage 4) PUs. Reconstruction of a PU is aimed at improving patient quality of life, preventing or resolving infection, reducing fluid and protein loss, and preventing future malignancy. In general, stages III and IV PUs often require flap reconstruction to achieve closure.
Surgical intervention includes radical excision of the ulcer, bursa, surrounding scar tissue, and any heterotopic calcification. Underlying bone is debrided to ensure there is no retained niche of osteomyelitis. Surgeons may choose to perform a staged surgery in the presence of osteomyelitis; however, most surgeons prefer debridement and reconstruction at the same time to minimize risks to the patient, time, and resources. Once the wound has been appropriately debrided, it may be closed in a variety of ways, depending on the location, any previous scars or operations, and the surgeon’s clinical preference. Options for surgical management of PUs include direct closure (rarely used due to its high rate of wound recurrence), skin grafting, skin flaps, and musculocutaneous flaps.5,6
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes associated with the use of a cryopreserved placental membrane containing viable cells (vCPM) graft for the augmentation of surgical flap closure in nonhealing PUs.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4 immobile patients with paraplegia with perineal PUs who received surgical treatment with muscle flap augmented with vCPM. The study included 2 men and 2 women with an average age of 61 years (range, 44–77 years). Patients were all from various nursing facilities in the Pittsburgh, PA area, and accurate wound measurements were not available. Pressure ulcers were staged according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel staging guidelines.7 Ulcers were located on either the ischial, gluteal, or sacral area with a mean duration of 4 years (range, 0.5–10 years). All PUs were treated with surgical debridement followed by the application of intraoperative vCPM (Grafix CORE; Osiris Therapeutics, Inc, Columbia, MD) to the wound bed prior to muscle flap closure.
As a human tissue allograft regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration under 21 CFR Part 1271 Part 361 Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular- and Tissue-based Products, vCPM can be utilized as a wound cover or barrier for a broad variety of acute and chronic wounds at all locations. Human placental membrane (HPM) has unique anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antimicrobial properties.8-10 It has low immunogenicity and can be used as an allograft without matching between donors and recipients.11 The vCPM graft contains a 3-dimensional extracellular matrix, growth factors, and retains viable neonatal fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells native to fresh placental membrane.8-10 The vCPM graft is conforming and easily adheres to moist wound beds as well as deep anatomic structures such as bone and tendon.
In this series, vCPM was applied to the debrided perineal wound bed without the need for anchoring or suturing. The myocutaneous flap then was closed primarily over the graft. In situations where the graft may migrate, it can be anchored in place with sutures, staples, or fibrin adhesive.
Results
Following muscle flap closure augmented with vCPM, all 4 patients achieved complete wound closure in an average of 7 weeks (range, 6–8 weeks) without complications or recurrence (Table). Complete muscle flap incorporation was demonstrated in all patient cases and surgical wound closure was maintained for an average follow-up of 12 months. Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 show the preoperative PUs, intraoperative muscle flap with skin closure placement, and follow-up with ulcer and skin closure maintained.
Discussion
Immobility is a key risk factor for PU development. About 70% of all PUs occur in immobile or elderly patients whose tissue is less resistant to external insults; of these, the incidence of sacral ulcers is 23%.12 Spinal cord injury, severe illness, poor nutritional status, trauma, impaired consciousness, or prolonged surgery also increase PU risk.6,13-16
Individuals who develop PUs have a 3.6-times greater risk of death within 21 months.17 Patients are at substantial risk for ulcer recurrence at the same location if preventative measures, such as proper offloading, reduction of friction, control of microenvironment, monitoring of nutritional status, psychosocial status, and infection control are not enforced. Kuwahara et al18 showed 37.5% of operated patients will have a recurrence of the PU and that mortality with associated ulcers was 68.8%.
Because of the risk for such complications, there is ongoing demand for novel techniques that augment surgical closure of PUs in compromised patients. Recent vCPM clinical studies reported durable closure of chronic wounds of various etiologies.19,20 Most recently, Frykberg et al21 and Suzuki et al22 reported the positive clinical outcomes of vCPM in the management of complex wounds with exposed tendon and/or bone. Frykberg et al,21 in a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, showed 96.3% of patients achieved 100% granulation and 59.3% achieved complete wound closure by 16 weeks; similarly, Suzuki et al22 demonstrated 100% wound closure using vCPM without concomitant use of negative pressure, hyperbaric oxygen treatment, or surgical intervention.
Based on these clinical evidences, the benefit of vCPM was evaluated after augmenting surgical repair of late-stage PUs in immobile patients with underlying comorbidities. The results were compared with muscle flap procedures that did not utilize augmentation with allograft. Results of vCPM use in this study showed better clinical outcomes in comparison with historically known outcomes.23,24In a 10-year study of 78 patients with spinal cord injuries with PUs, Ahluwalia et al23 showed a 16% complication rate and a 7% recurrence rate was observed following surgical flap closure, while a separate study of 119 patients treated with a similar method of flap closure showed complication and recurrence rates of 26% and 11%, respectively.24
In addition to procedure selection and the adjunct use of beneficial biologic products to aid in durable wound closure, proper postoperative offloading can define the outcome of the ulcer reconstruction. In the present cases, air-fluid beds were utilized for offloading. From the time of transfer from the operating table to an air-fluid bed, care must be exercised to prevent shearing and tension across the flap repair. Patients are positioned supinely in the air-fluid bed for 6 weeks followed by gradual progression through semi-sitting position, graduated mobility sitting, and self-lifting to relieve pressure.
This series demonstrates a novel use of vCPM used in conjunction with standard myocutaneous flap techniques to improve healing outcomes in immobilized patients with perineal wounds. Historical comparisons show complication risks in this population; therefore, procedures that utilize viable graft tissue may improve wound closure rates in these patients.
Limitations
While the vCPM-augmented flap reconstruction technique should be considered to augment surgical repairs, the lack of active or historical patient comparator, small sample size, and retrospective nature of data collection present significant limitations to the reported outcomes.
Conclusions
All patients with chronic, stage IV perineal PUs in the current study proceeded to complete closure of the vCPM-augmented flap reconstruction sites without complications or recurrence during a 12-month follow-up period. This report demonstrates that a vCPM allograft can be used in conjunction with standard muscle flap repair techniques to decrease complications and recurrence rates and yield satisfactory outcomes for defects repaired by muscle flap reconstruction. Larger clinical studies are needed to compare this technique with others to gain a better understanding of its applicability to surgical practice. This case series presents a novel use of vCPM combined with standard myocutaneous flap reconstruction, demonstrating clinical benefits for immobile patients, resulting in complete wound closure and avoiding the need for surgical revision or rehospitalization.
Acknowledgments
Authors: Dinakar Golla, MD1; and Dorothy H. Kurtz Phelan, DPM2
Affiliations: 1Dinakar Plastic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA; and 2Osiris Therapeutics, Inc, Columbia, MD
Correspondence: Molly Saunders, Senior Manager, Clinical Operations, Osiris Therapeutics, Inc, 7015 Albert Einstein Drive, Columbia, MD 21046; MSaunders@osiris.com
Disclosure: At the time of acceptance, Dr. Kurtz Phelan was a full-time employee of Osiris Therapeutics Inc.
References
1. Kosiak M. Etiology of decubitus ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961;42:19–29.
2. Cox J. Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(5):364–375.
3. Kim CM, Yun IS, Lee DW, Lew DH, Rah DK, Lee WJ. Treatment of ischial pressure sores with both profunda femoris artery perforator flaps and muscle flaps. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(4):387–393.
4. Lee SS, Huang SH, Chen MC, Chang KP, Lai CS, Lin SD. Management of recurrent ischial pressure sore with gracilis muscle flap and V-Y profunda femoris artery perforator-based flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(10):1339–1346.
5. Smith, JL, Forsberg JA, Bonnecarrere ER, Potter BK. Management of a massive stage IV sacral decubitus ulcer with an anterior flap hip disarticulation and myocutaneous gastrocnemius fillet flap in-continuity. Orthopedics. 2010;33(6):439.
6. Sunn G. Spinal cord injury pressure ulcer treatment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(3):671–680.
7. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009.
8. Duan-Arnold Y, Gyurdieva A, Johnson A, Uveges TE, Jacobstein DA, Danilkovitch A. Retention of endogenous viable cells enhances the anti-inflammatory activity of cryopreserved amnion. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(9):523–533.
9. Duan-Arnold Y, Uveges TE, Gyurdieva A, Johnson A, Danilkovitch A. Angiogenic potential of cryopreserved amnion is enhanced through retention of all tissue components in their native state. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(9):513–522.
10. Duan-Arnold Y, Gyurdieva A, Johnson A, Jacobstein DA, Danilkovitch A. Soluble factors released by endogenous viable cells enhance the antioxidant and chemoattractive activities of cryopreserved amniotic membrane. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(6):329–338.
11. Mamede AC, Carvlho MJ, Abrantes AM, Laranjo M, Maia CJ, Botelho MF. Amniotic membrane: from structure and function to clinical application [published online May 18, 2012]. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(2):447–458.
12. Agris, J, Spira M. Review of pressure ulcers: prevention and treatment. Clin Symp. 1979;31(5):1–32.
13. Shahin ESM, Meijers JMM, Schols JMGA, Tannen A, Halfens RJG, Dassen T. The relationship between malnutrition parameters and pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes. Nutrition. 2010;26(9):886–889.
14. Watts D, Abrahams E, MacMillan C, Sanat J, Silver R, VanGorder S, et al. Insult after injury: pressure ulcers in trauma patients. Orthop Nurs. 1998;17(4):84–91.
15. Agrawal K, Chauhan N. Pressure ulcers: back to basics. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(2): 244–254.
16. Walton-Geer PS. Prevention of pressure ulcer in the surgical patient. AORN J. 2009;89(3):538–548.
17. Leijon S, Bersh I, Terstappen K. Pressure ulcer prevalence, use of preventive measures, and mortality risk in an acute care population: a quality improvement project. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013;40(5):469–474.
18. Kuwahara M, Tada H, Mashiba K, et al. Mortality and recurrence rate after pressure ulcer operation for elderly long-term bedridden patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(6):629–632.
19. Regulski M, Jacobstein DA, Petranto RD, Migliori BJ, Nair G, Pfeiffer D. A retrospective analysis of a human cellular repair matrix for the treatment of chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013;59(12):38–43.
20. Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al; Grafix Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Grafix for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi-centre, controlled, randomized, blinded, clinical trial [published online July 21, 2014]. Int Wound J. 2014;11(5):554–560.
21. Frykberg RG, Gibbons GW, Walters JL, Wukich DK, Milstein FC. A prospective, multicentre, open label, single arm, clinical trial for treatment of chronic, complex diabetic foot wounds with exposed tendon and/or bone: positive clinical outcomes of viable cryopreserved human placental membrane [published online August 3, 2016]. Int Wound J. 2016;14(3):569–577.
22. Suzuki K, Michael G, Tamire Y. Viable intact cryopreserved human placental membrane for a non-surgical approach to closure in complex wounds. J Wound Care. 2016;25(Sup 10):S23–S31.
23. Ahluwalia R, Martin D, Mahoney JL. The operative treatment of pressure wounds: a 10-year experience in flap selection. Int Wound J. 2010;7(2):103–106.
24. Wettstein R, Tremp M, Baumberger M, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF. Local flap therapy for the treatment of pressure sore wounds [published online October 17, 2013]. Int Wound J. 2015;12(5):572–576.