Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Peer Review

Peer Reviewed

Case Report

Mycoplasma hominis Ascending Aortic Graft Infection Successfully Treated With Graft Preservation Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time

December 2020
1943-2704
Wounds 2020;32(12):E67–E70.

Abstract

Introduction. Thoracic aortic graft infection is a rare complication after cardiac surgery with no consensus having been reached on the most appropriate type of management. Although most commonly caused by gram-positive cocci, aortic graft infection by Mycoplasma hominis can occur. Case Report. A 63-year-old male patient with an aneurysm of the ascending aorta was admitted to the authors’ institution for surgical treatment. A replacement of the ascending aorta with a polyester vascular graft was performed using a valve-sparing aortic valve reimplantation technique. During postoperative course, the patient became septic with a spiking fever and elevated inflammatory markers. A computed tomography scan revealed signs of mediastinitis. M hominis was identified in blood cultures and intraoperative tissue samples. An antibiogram-based antibiotic solution (tigecycline in 5% glucose solution) was instilled twice daily into the thoracic cavity using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time for 8 days. This type of management allowed the authors to avoid graft replacement, and good midterm outcomes were achieved. Conclusions. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first described successful treatment of an aortic graft infection caused by M hominis without a surgical removal of the prosthetic material using antibiotic irrigation.

Introduction

Thoracic aortic graft infection is a complication of cardiac surgery that has an estimated overall occurrence rate of 0.5% to 3%.1 Although rare, it is one of the most severe complications related to high mortality, morbidity, and costs.2 There is no consensus regarding the best management of aortic graft infections. Arguably, the best solution would be a replacement with a homograft; however, this requires another major surgical intervention while facing a shortage of available homografts. Some authors recommend combining radical surgical debridement with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and antibiotic therapy.2-5 Most commonly, aortic graft infections occur in the first 3 months after surgery and result from direct contamination of graft intraoperatively or shortly thereafter from the skin.

Prosthetic vascular graft infections are related to biofilm-producing bacteria. Natural antibiotic resistance with bacteria in biofilm is a major obstacle for a successful treatment unless the prosthetic material is completely removed. Therefore, the treatment of graft-associated infection with the retention of prosthetic material should always include antibiotics that penetrate the biofilm.6

Hematogenous infections from a distant focus are rare.6 Intrathoracic vascular graft infections are most commonly caused by gram-positive cocci, followed by gram-negative rods,7 which also guide the empiric therapy in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infections. Other microorganisms are rare. Mycoplasma infections of the graft are very rare with only a few cases reported in literature.8-11 The present authors report a case of ascending aortic graft infection with Mycoplasma hominis that was successfully treated with NPWT with antibiotic irrigation, surgical debridement, and systemic antibiotics.

Case Report

A 63-year-old man with arterial hypertension was admitted to the Department of Cardiac Surgery due to ascending aortic aneurysm with concomitant severe aortic regurgitation. Aortic valve sparing surgery with the reimplantation of the coronary arteries12 was performed using a prosthetic gelatin-sealed polyester vascular graft (Gelweave; Vascutek Terumo). Six days after the initial surgery, biological aortic valve replacement was necessary because of residual regurgitation of the aortic valve.

After the second procedure, the initial postoperative course was favorable. On post-op day (POD) 13 after the first surgery, his inflammatory markers were elevated (C-reactive protein [CRP] 107 mg/L, leukocytosis 15x109/L), and at that time without any clinical signs of infection. Echocardiography showed small pericardial effusion without other signs of graft or valve malfunction. The patient deteriorated the next day (POD 14), with signs of sepsis and spiking fever. Further increase in his inflammatory markers (CRP 202 mg/L, procalcitonin remained low 0.17 pg/mL) was observed. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed periaortic fluid and a small pericardial effusion. (Figures 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3). There was no air or signs of an abscess. After obtaining blood cultures, empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy with imipenem/cilastatin and vancomycin was initiated, and the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit.

On POD 16, echocardiography showed significant pericardial effusion, while valve and graft function remained normal. A surgical reexploration was performed with no signs of intrathoracic infection detected. Samples of pericardial effusion and intrathoracic tissue were collected for microbiological analysis.

Despite the broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, the patient remained septic (CRP values remained above 250 mg/L), although the surgical wound showed no signs of infection. Four days later (POD 20), there was sternum instability; the patient underwent a reoperation. Intraoperatively, pus was evident in the pericardium. No signs of graft dehiscence were observed, although necrotic tissue was present around the graft. Sternal wires were removed, radical debridement of the perigraft region and thoracic cavity with lavage was performed, and NPWT with instillation (V.A.C. ULTA; 3M + KCI) was administered. Antiseptic fluid (0.02% polihexanide; Prontosan; B. Braun Medical AG) was instilled over the infected region for 10 minutes, after which continuous negative pressure (-125 mm Hg) was applied for 60 minutes. The same antibiotic therapy continued, because Gram stains of pericardial fluid were negative, and no growth was observed on standard microbiological cultures of pericardial effusion. Blood cultures remained sterile in the first 10 days of incubation. On POD 23, blood cultures were positive, and a microbiologist observed a growth of small colonies of bacteria without cell walls on blood cultures as well as in all the intraoperative tissue samples. Mycoplasma hominis was identified using real-time polymerase chain reaction.13

Based on the identified microorganism, the antibiotic therapy was changed to tigecycline 50 mg twice daily and levofloxacin 500 mg BID intravenously. Initially, the authors did not opt for doxycycline due to unpredicted gut absorption of oral therapy in the critically ill patient.14 After consultation with a clinical pharmacologist, the authors decided to install tigecycline in the thoracic cavity using NPWT with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d; V.A.C. VERAFLO Therapy; 3M + KCI). The standard reticulated open cell foam dressing (V.A.C. VERAFLO CLEANSE CHOICE Dressing; KCI + 3M) was used. The authors irrigated the thoracic cavity twice daily with a solution of 50 mg of tigecycline in a 5% glucose solution. After instillation, the solutions were allowed to dwell for 15 minutes, followed by 3 hours of -125 mm Hg continuous negative pressure. Dressing changes were performed every 2 days. No side effects of this therapy were observed, although the authors were aware of the potentially large reabsorption capacity of the thoracic cavity. Four additional surgical debridements were required during the next 10 days, but inflammatory markers began to decrease, and the patient became afebrile and stable shortly after the change of therapy.

The authors used NWPTi-d for 8 days. The patient was switched to oral monotherapy with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily after 23 days of parenteral therapy. The patient was discharged from the hospital after 12 weeks of therapy and continued therapy with doxycycline 100 mg BID for another 9 months. At the 12-month follow-up visit, he had no clinical problems, computed tomographic angiography of the thorax showed no signs of perigraft inflammation, and inflammatory markers were low; the authors decided to discontinue the antibiotic treatment. Two years later, the patient is clinically stable, with no recurrent episodes of infection and an improved quality of life. The patient continues to be managed on an outpatient basis.

Discussion

Prosthetic graft infections are rare, but devastating surgical complications that diminish postoperative survival. Early postoperative aortic graft infections are usually caused by gram-positive cocci or gram-negative rods, whereas M hominis graft infections are extremely rare with only a few reports in the literature. M hominis can colonize the urogenital and respiratory tract, most commonly causing pelvic inflammatory disease or bacterial vaginosis in women. The bacteria are rarely associated with other infections; there are reports of infections after coronary bypass grafting or in heart transplant recipients.8,9 The authors conjecture that the mechanism of infection in the present patient was a hematogenous spread of bacteria due to urinary catheterization, femoral catheter, or endotracheal intubation because no signs of sternal wound infection were initially present.

This case demonstrates a successful treatment of M hominis aortic graft infection with graft preservation using systemic and local antimicrobial therapy combined with surgical debridement and NPWTi-d. Negative pressure wound therapy is well-known in the treatment of mediastinitis after cardiac surgery15-17; reports in the literature,18,19 show that NWPTi-d better reduces the quantity of bacterial load locally than NWPT alone in the treatment of wound infections. Usually, antiseptic solutions have been used for irrigation, but reports also discuss the use of antimicrobial solutions for irrigation, such as vancomycin, tobramycin and gentamicin.20 Although tigecycline and levofloxacin both have good tissue penetration,21 no published data exist on antibiotic penetration in perigraft tissue. Based on this assumption and due to our critically ill patient, we decided to add antibiotic tigecycline to the irrigation solution to achieve good local antibiotic concentration in the perigraft area. A staged treatment approach was used in accordance with the current literature22,23 due to the authors’ intention to leave the infected material inside the thoracic cavity for as long as it is possible (recovery or infection progression).

Conclusions

A challenging case regarding early postoperative prosthetic aortic graft infection with an unusual pathogen M hominis inspired the authors' decision to irrigate the infected graft using NPWT with antibiotic instillation in addition to surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first described successful treatment of an aortic graft infection due to M hominis without a surgical removal of the prosthetic material using antibiotic irrigation. It should be emphasized that a multidisciplinary approach played a crucial part in this patient’s successful treatment.

Acknowledgments

Authors: Miha Antonič, MD, PhD1; Anže Djordjević, MD1; Peter Jurič, MD1; Maja Pirnat, MD2; and Nina Gorišek Miksić, MD, PhD3

Affiliations: 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia; 2Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia; and 3Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

Correspondence: Anže Djordjević, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Slovenia, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor; anze.djordjevic@ukc-mb.si; anze.djordjevic@gmail.com

Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.

References

1. Coselli JS, Crawford ES, Williams TW Jr, et al. Treatment of postoperative infection of ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch, including use of viable omentum and muscle flaps. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50(6):868–881. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(90)91111-n

2. Akowuah E, Narayan P, Angelini G, Bryan AJ. Management of prosthetic graft infection after surgery of the thoracic aorta: removal of the prosthetic graft is not necessary. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(4):1051–1052. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.02.055

3. Saiki Y, Kawamoto S, Sai S, Tabayashi K. An effective vacuum-assisted closure treatment for mediastinitis with aortic arch replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(4):712–714.

4. Fuiji T, Watanabe Y. Multidisciplinary treatment approach for prosthetic vascular graft infection in the thoracic aortic area. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21(5):418–427. doi:10.5761/atcs.ra.15-00187

5. Suzuki T, Kawamoto S, Motoyoshi N, et al. Contemporary outcome of the surgical management of prosthetic graft infection after a thoracic aortic replacement: is there a room to consider vaccum-assisted wound closure as an alternative? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63(2):86–92. doi:10.1007/s11748-014-0451-5

6. Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, et al. Editor’s choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):339–384. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016

7. FitzGerald SF, Kelly C, Humphreys H. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(6):996–999. doi:10.1093/jac/dki382

8. Mossad SB, Rehm SJ, Tomford JW, et al. Sternotomy infection with Mycoplasma hominis: a cause of “culture negative” wound infection. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;37(5):505–509.

9. Dan M, Robertson J. Mycoplasma hominis septicaemia after heart surgery. Am J Med. 1988;84(5):976–977. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(88)90085-x

10. Garcia-de-la-Fuente C, Minambres E, Ugalde E, Saez A, Martinez-Martinez L, Farinas MC. Post-operative mediastinitis, pleuritic and pericarditis due to Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum with a fatal outcome. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(Pt 5):656–657. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47632-010

11. Myers PO, Khabiri E, Greub G,Kalangos A. Mycoplasma hominis mediastinitis after acute aortic dissection repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11(6):857–858. doi:10.1510/icvts.2010.244608

12. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103(4):617–621.

13. Waites KB, Xiao L, Paralanov V, Viscardi RM, Glass JL. Molecular methods for the detection of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in humans. JMD. 2012;14(5):437–450. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.06.001

14. Reintam Blaser A, Preiser JC, Fruhwald S, et al; Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function within the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition (MEN Section) of ESICM. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of intensive care medicine. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):224. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02889-4

15. Deniz H, Gokaslan G, Arslanoglu Y, et al. Treatment outcomes of postoperative mediastinitis in cardiac surgery: negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional treatment. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7:67. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-7-67

16. Sjogren J, Malmsjo M, Gustafsson R, Ingemansson R. Poststernotomy mediastinitis: a review of conventional surgical treatments, vacuum-assisted closure therapy and presentation of the Lund University Hospital mediastinitis algorithm. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(6):898–905. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.09.020

17. Karaca S, Kalangos A. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)-Instill® with continuous irrigation for the treatment of Mycoplasma hominis mediastinitis. Int Wound J. 2015;12(5):595–597. doi:10.1111/iwj.12234

18. Goss SG, Schwartz JA, Facchin F, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) better reduces post-debridement bioburden in chronically infected lower extremity wounds than NPWT alone. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2014;4(4):74–80. doi:10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001

19. Uoya Y, Ishii N, Kishi K. Comparing the therapeutic value of negative pressure wound therapy and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time in bilateral leg ulcers: a case report. Wounds. 2019;31(9):E61–E64.

20. Wolvos T. Wound instillation —the next step in negative pressure wound therapy. Lessons learned from initial experiences. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(11):56–66.

21. Rodvold KA, Gotfried MH, Cwik M, et al. Serum, tissue and body fluid concentrations of tigecycline after a single 100 mg dose. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(6):1211–1229. doi:10.1093/jac/dkl403

22. Tossios P, Karantzopoulos A, Tsagakis P, et al. Treatment of infected thoracic aortic prosthetic grafts with the in situ preservation strategy: a review of its history, surgical technique, and results. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23(1):24–31. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2013.09.001

23. Umminger J, Krueger H, Beckmann E, et al. Management of early graft infections in the ascending aorta and aortic arch: a comparison between graft replacement and graft preservation techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(4):660–667. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw150

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement