Effects of Beta-D-Glucan on Diabetic Colon Anastomosis
Index: WOUNDS. 2013;25(7):171-177.
Abstract: Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of beta-D-glucan on the experimental diabetic rat colon anastomosis model. Background. Beta-D-glucan is a commonly used macrophage activator and promotes wound healing by increasing macrophage infiltration into the wound. The decrease in the function of macrophages and impaired wound healing can be observed in diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods. Eighty Spraque-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: colon anastomosis (group 1); colon anastomosis + DM (group 2); colon anastomosis + beta-D-glucan (group 3); and colon anastomosis + beta-D-glucan + DM (group 4). Diabetes was induced with streptozotocin (85 mg/kg), and glycemia was assessed before induction at days 14 and 17. Colon anastomosis was performed at day 14. Beta-D-glucan (100 mg/kg/day) was administered 2 days before colon anastomosis and given orally for 5 days. Relaparotomies were done 3 days after colon anastomosis, and anastomotic bursting pressures, anastomotic hydroxyproline levels, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and histopathology examinations were studied. Results. There were no differences among groups for hydroxyproline levels. The mean values of anastomotic bursting pressures in group 4 were significantly higher than those of group 2. The mean values of MDA levels in group 2 were significantly lower than those of group 4. Group 2 showed a significant difference in the amount of necrosis, accumulation of polmorphonuclear cells, and edema when compared with groups 1, 3, and 4 (P < 0.001, P < 0.002, and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion. This study indicates that oral administration of beta-D-glucan significantly improves the impaired anastomotic healing in rats with diabetes mellitus.
Introduction
Anastomotic dehiscence is a recognized complication of abdominal surgery with concomitant high morbidity and mortality rates. Several factors such as ischemia, jaundice, infection, diabetes mellitus (DM), and malignancies can increase the risk of anastomotic dehiscence.1,2 Diabetes mellitus is known to be a contributing factor to impaired wound healing in humans.3,4 Diabetes, through the nonenzymatic glycosylation mechanism, can have a significant impact on the development of the healing process in colonic anastomosis by impairing its strength and the migration of inflammatory cells, thus delaying reepithelization and reducing the quality of collagen deposition and new vessel formation.5-7 A large body of evidence indicates that the diabetic state is associated with a delayed or reduced repair capacity. Experimental studies with streptozotocin-induced, or genetically diabetic rodents, demonstrate that cutaneous wound strength and gastrointestinal tract strength are decreased similarly.8-10 Beta-D-glucan is a commonly used macrophage activator shown to improve normal wound healing. It is a glucose polymer derived from yeast and employed as an immune stimulant in clinical studies. Poly-branched beta-1,3-D-glucans are naturally occurring polysaccharides, with or without beta-1,6-D-glucose side chains, that are integral in cell wall constituents in a variety of bacteria, plants, and fungi. Glucan receptors that deliver non-self-derived glucan to the immune response have been identified on macrophages, dendritic cells, and other cells. The beta-1,3-D-glucan with beta-1,6-glucan linkage extracted from yeast cell walls (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has been shown to act as a potent nonspecific immune-activator. Oral, topical, or systemic administration of beta-D-glucan promotes wound healing by increasing macrophage infiltration into the wound milieu, stimulating collagen synthesis and reepithelization. When taken orally, enterocytes facilitate the transportation of beta glucans and similar compounds across the intestinal cell wall into the lymph where they begin to interact with macrophages to activate the immune function. Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that the oral form of beta-D-glucan has similar protective effects as the injected version, including defense against infectious diseases and cancer.11-18 Macrophages are vital to the regulation of immune responses and the development of inflammation. They produce monokines, enzymes, complement proteins, and regulatory factors such as interleukin-1. Macrophages also play an important role in wound healing by producing humoral factors and by increasing fibroplasia, fibrogenesis, and angiogenesis in wounded tissue. The decrease in the function of macrophages has been shown to impair wound healing and can be observed in DM. Similarly, enhanced macrophage function has been demonstrated to accelerate wound healing. In this study, the authors have evaluated the role of beta-D-glucan on the experimental diabetic rat colon anastomosis model.
Methods
The procedures and animal protocols followed in this study complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,19 and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Eighty Spraque-Dawley rats weighting 200 g - 250 g were randomized into 4 groups: colon anastomosis (group 1, n = 20); colon anastomosis + DM (group 2, n = 20); colon anastomosis + beta-D-glucan (group 3, n = 20); colon anastomosis + beta-D-glucan + DM (group 4, n = 20).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388e9/388e942a354b93d5fde21a254027577e452679ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f448/6f44856767d9be82db1062d9059740a1a7a60631" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6605/d66056e6b6a24c24a112202dea9082c52fce8bc0" alt=""
Results
During the course of experimental protocols, all animals survived the operations. There were no wound infections as assessed by clinical inspection. Mean weight loss in the DM groups was approximately 13%. The mean values of the hydroxyproline levels for the groups were 33.2 ± 1.6, 31.3 ± 1.1, 32.3 ± 1.0, and 30.4 ± 1.7, respectively (Table 3). There were no significant differences among the groups. The mean values of the MDA levels for the groups were 24.2 ± 5.6, 10.9 ± 1.5, 15.8 ± 1.4, and 13.5 ± 1.1, respectively (Table 3). Malondialdehyde levels in the DM group (group 2) were significantly lower than the levels of groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.004). The mean values of anastomotic bursting pressures were 51.2 ± 2.3, 32.6 ± 2.7, 58.9 ± 2.3, and 44.4 ± 2.5, respectively (Table 3). The mean values of the anastomotic bursting pressures of the DM group (group 2) were significantly lower than those of the control group (group 1) (P < 0.003) and also were significantly lower than those of groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Discussion
Anastomotic dehiscence is a recognized complication of abdominal surgery and has concomitant high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, factors contributing to poor anastomotic healing are of clinical importance and have been the subject of several earlier studies.24-26 According to other studies, the effects of a multitude of experimental conditions and substances include infection, hypovolemia, lavage, pectin, prostaglandin, vitamin A, aprotinin, cytostatics, and nutrition.27,28 Diabetes mellitus has been reported as an important risk factor causing the impairment of anastomotic wound healing.3,6-10 The effects of DM on anastomotic wound healing have been suggested to be a result of decreased mononuclear cell inflammation, neovascularization, and collagen synthesis.6,7,10 Also the absence of diabetic control endangers anastomotic integrity and enhances the possibility of leakage and its subsequent severe complication. Patients with poorly controlled DM show an increased susceptibility to infection, possibly caused by the suppression of certain immunological functions. Since it has been reported that collagenase activity is enhanced in wounds from diabetic animals, it seems conceivable that a limited and localized degradation of collagen fibrils may loosen the structure of the matrix, thereby diminishing its capacity to retain the sutures and leading to loss of strength and eventually to anastomotic leakage.29,30 The authors observed the parameters of the anastomotic wound healing only on the third postoperative day, because recent studies of the effects of diabetes on anastomotic wound healing reported that the deleterious effects are limited to the early postoperative period.23 It has also been reported that diabetes impairs anastomotic wound healing during the early (ie, inflammatory) healing phase by delaying the migration of inflammatory cells.5-7
Conclusion
This study found that oral administration of beta-D-glucan improves impaired anastomotic wound healing in rats with DM. The deleterious effects of DM on anastomotic wound healing can be treated with oral administration of beta-D-glucan.
References
1. Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):549-573. 2. Wagner OJ, Egger B. Influential factors in anastomosis healing [in German]. Swiss Surg. 2003;9(3):105-113. 3. Goodson WH 3rd, Hunt TK. Wound healing and the diabetic patient. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;149(4):600-608. 4. Cruse PJE, Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973;107(2):206-210. 5. Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(suppl 8):S538-S546. 6. Verhofstad MH, Hendriks T. Diabetes impairs the development of early strength, but not the accumulation of collagen, during intestinal anastomotic healing in the rat. Br J Surg. 1994;81(7):1040-1045. 7. Black CT, Hennessey PJ, Ford EG, Andrassy RJ. Protein glycosylation and collagen metabolism in normal and diabetic rats. J Surg Res. 1989;47(3):200-202. 8. Wang CM, Lincoln J, Cook JE, Becker DL. Abnormal connexin expression underlies delayed wound healing in diabetic skin. Diabetes. 2007;56(11):2809-2817. 9. Biondo-Simões Mde L, Biondo-Simões R, Ioshii SO, Barczak DS, Tetilla MR. Effects of hyperglycemia and aging on the healing of colonic anastomoses in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2009;24(2):136-143. 10. LeBlanc BW, Albina JE, Reichner JS. The effect of PGG-beta-glucan on neutrophil chemotaxis in vivo. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79(4):667-675. 11. Davis SC, Perez R. Cosmeceuticals and natural products: wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27(5):502-506. 12. Ooi VE, Liu F. Immunomodulation and anti-cancer activity of polysaccharide-protein complexes. Curr Med Chem. 2000;7(7):715-729. 13. Hong F, Hansen RD, Yan J, et al. Beta-glucan functions as an adjuvant for monoclonal antibody immunotherapy by recruiting tumoricidal granulocytes as killer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63(24):9023-9031. 14. Vetvicka V, Terayama K, Mandeville R, Brousseau P, Kournikakis B, Ostroff G. Pilot study: orally-administered yeast β1,3-glucan prophylactically protects against anthrax infection and cancer in mice. J Am Nutraceutical Assoc. 2002;5(2):1-5. 15. Rice PJ, Adams EL, Ozment-Skelton T, et al. Oral delivery and gastrointestinal absorption of soluble glucans stimulate increased resistance to infectious challenge. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;314(3):1079-1086. 16. Babineau TJ, Marcello P, Swails W, Kenler A, Bistrian B, Forse RA. Randomized phase I/II trial of a macrophage-specific immunomodulator (PGG-glucan) in high-risk surgical patients. Ann Surg. 1994;220(5):601-609. 17. Suzuki I, Tanaka H, Kinoshita A, Oikawa S, Osawa M, Yadomae T. Effect of orally administered beta-glucan on macrophage function in mice. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1990;12(6):675-684. 18. National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996. 19. Suzuki I, Hashimoto K, Ohno N, Tanaka H, Yadomae T. Immunomodulation by orally administered beta-glucan in mice. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1989;11(7):761-769. 20. Bergman I, Loxley R. Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Ann Chem. 1963;35(12):1961-1965. 21. Mihara M, Uchiyama M. Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem. 1978;86(1):271-278. 22. Verhofstad MH, Lange WP, van der Laak JA, Verhofstad AA, Hendriks T. Microscopic analysis of anastomotic healing in the intestine of normal and diabetic rats. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(3):423-431. 23. Ballantyne GH. The experimental bases of intestinal suturing. Effect of surgical technique, inflamation and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(1):61-71. 24. Irvin TT. Collagen metabolism in infected colonic anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143(2):220-224. 25. Zmora O, Pikarsky AJ, Wexner SD. Bowel preparation for colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1537-1549. 26. Foster ME, Johnson CD, Billings PJ, Davies PW, Leaper DJ. Intraoperative antegrade lavage and anastomotic healing in acute colonic obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986; 29(4):255-259. 27. Hesp FL, Hendriks T, Lubbers EJ, de Boer HH. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. Effects of infection on experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(7):462-467. 28. Takeuchi K, Takehara K, Tajima K, Kato S, Hirata T. Impaired healing of gastric lesions in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: effect of basic fibroblast growth factor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;281(1):200-207. 29. Dinc S, Durmus E, Gulcelik MA, et al. Effects of beta-D-glucan on steroid-induced impairment of colonic anastomotic healing. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(1):63-67. 30. Onderdonk AB, Cisneros RL, Hinkson P, Ostroff G. Anti-infective effect of poly-beta 1-6-glucotriosyl-beta 1-3-glucopyranose glucan in vivo. Infect Immun. 1992;60(4):1642-1647. 31. Kernodle DS, Gates H, Kaiser AB. Prophylactic anti-infective activity of poly-[1-6]- beta-D-glucopyranosyl-[1-3]-beta-D-glucopryanose glucan in a guinea pig model of staphylococcal wound infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(3):545-549. 32. Tzianabos AO, Gibson FC 3rd, Cisneros RL, Kasper DL. Protection against experimental intraabdominal sepsis by two polysaccharide immunomodulators. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(1):200-206. 33. Sener G, Toklu H, Ercan F, Erkanli G. Protective effect of beta-glucan against oxidative organ injury in a rat model of sepsis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2005;5(9):1387-1396. 34. Portera CA, Love EJ, Memore L, et al. Effect of macrophage stimulation on collagen biosynthesis in the healing wound. Am Surg. 1997;63(2):125-131. 35. Browder W, Williams D, Pretus H, et al. Beneficial effect of enhanced macrophage function in the trauma patient. Ann Surg. 1990;211(5):605-613. 36. Kirmaz C, Bayrak P, Yilmaz O, Yuksel H. Effects of glucan treatment on the Th1/Th2 balance in patients with allergic rhinitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2005;16(2):128-134. 37. Hendriks T, Mastboom WJ. Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(10):891-901 38. Reilly PM, Schiller HJ, Bulkley GB. Pharmacologic approach to tissue injury mediated by free radicals and other reactive oxygen metabolites. Am J Surg. 1991;161(4):488-503. Erdinc Yenidogan, MD is from the Department of General Surgery, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey. Mehmet Ali Gulcelik, MD; and Haluk Alagol, MD are from the Department of General Surgery, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Isin Pak, MD is from the Department of Pathology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Gokhan Giray Akgul, MD is from the Department of General Surgery, Dogansehir City Hospital, Malatya, Turkey. Muhammet Kadri Colakoglu, MD is from the Department of General Surgery,Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Address correspondence to: Erdinc Yenidogan, MD Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine Department of General Surgery Tokat, Turkey claritromisin@yahoo.com Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.