Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Original Research

The Effect of Topical Combination Therapy in Wound Healing: An Experimental Study

March 2014
1943-2704
WOUNDS. 2014;26(2):E22-E29.

Abstract

Objective. While topical therapies are common in wound care, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of combination topical therapy. Material and Methods. The authors designed a device that could irrigate and apply topical oxygen and topical negative pressure on the wound.  A round full-thickness excision wound was made on the backs of 30 rabbits, and the animals were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. The rabbits in the treated group received cycles of irrigation, negative pressure, and topical oxygen therapy 3 times a day for 60 minutes. In the control group, the wounds were irrigated with normal saline. The wound area was determined by image analysis software on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 after the initial wound creation. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data with SPSS 16.0 software. Results. On day 3 after wound creation, the percentage of wound closure in the treated group and control group was 30.1% and 3%, respectively, which shows the significant difference in healing (P = 0.0001). This trend was preserved in the rest of the study. Histological studies showed obvious enhancement in wound healing in the intervention group. Conclusion. The combination of the topical methods might have synergistic effects on wound healing.

Introduction

  Wounds are a major health care burden. In 2002, global wound care expenditures were $13 to $15 billion.1 It is estimated that 3-4 individuals per 1,000 develop acute or chronic wounds annually.2 In 1996, approximately 11 million wounds were evaluated and treated in emergency departments across the United States.3

  Skin-wound healing is an orchestrated biological phenomena consisting of 3 sequential phases of inflammation, proliferation, and maturation.4 The process usually takes 3 to 14 days to complete.1Although most acute wounds heal without a major problem,5 a considerable number of patients experience wound healing abnormalities.6 There is a growing need for a more specific and effective therapeutic agent to improve the healing process, especially in compromised wounds.5

  Through recorded history, wounds have been treated with topical medications and methods. Goals of topical wound management are speeding repair, preventing infection, reducing pain, removing dead tissue, providing a moist environment, reducing edema, and increasing blood flow.7,8 Occlusive dressings, which maintain wounds in the moist state, are an effective choice for topical wound management.9 Topical negative pressure (TNP) therapy is another effective method for wound management.1,8,10-14

  Therapies such as surgical revascularization and hyperbaric oxygen therapy have demonstrated that an improved perfusion and oxygenation of the wound accelerates the healing process. Topical oxygen therapy is a controversial issue. Some studies showed that topical oxygen therapy might enhance wound healing,15-17 although some experts believe this therapy might not be effective.1,7Irrigation is also a critical component of wound management, and is commonly performed with sterile normal saline solution or tap water.3,18-23 In emergency departments, continuous wound irrigation with 100-300 ml normal saline or tap water with 0.35-0.56 kgf/cm2 pressure generated by using a syringe, is recommended.3

  Finding new methods to improve wound healing can have a great value in clinical settings. In this research, the authors studied the simultaneous effect of some common topical methods in wound healing. A topical combination therapy delivery device was designed that could irrigate the wound and apply topical oxygen and negative pressure therapy as well. The goal of this study was to compare wound healing in the control group and in rabbits treated with the topical combination therapy delivery device.

Material and Methods

 Ethical issues. This research was approved by the ethical committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, and was registered as an Iranian Randomized Clinical Trial (number 20119296228N3). All the procedures were in accordance with the Iranian guidelines for laboratory animals and the principles of laboratory animal care. The research was conducted at the Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

  Experimental animals. In this interventional study, 30 mature male New Zealand rabbits weighing 4000-4500 g were housed in individual cages with controlled light, temperature, and humidity. The rabbits were fed commercial rabbit feed and water. Fresh carrots, cabbage, and lettuce were added to the commercial food.

  Wound creation. The animals were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of ketamin (40 mg/kg) and diazepam (4 mg/kg). The back of each animal, in the lumbar region, was shaved and prepared for aseptic surgery. A circular piece of skin with a radius of 2 cm was surgically excised, creating full-thickness type wounds.

  Experimental intervention. After wound creation, the 30 animals were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: treated group (n = 15) and control group (n = 15). The topical combination therapy delivery device had a plastic disc with an adhesive tape edge that could cover the wound. The plastic disc was held in place by an elastic band fastened around the rabbit. The disc was connected to the device by tubes.

  The device irrigated the wound with warmed normal saline (34 °C) with 0.45 kgf/cm2 pressure. The pressure and temperature were adjustable and the irrigation continued for 3 minutes. Suction was simultaneously applied to the wound to collect the normal saline. After irrigation, a negative pressure of 90 mm Hg on the first day, and 100 mm Hg for the rest of the study, was applied to the wounds for 1 minute. At the end of the cycle, 100% warm oxygen (34 ºC) was applied to the wound area for 1 minute. The cycle of irrigation, negative pressure, and topical oxygen therapy was repeated for 60 minutes. The device was used 3 times a day, at 10 am, 2 pm, and 6 pm, in the treated group. In the control group, wounds were washed with normal saline manually, the disc was placed on the wound but the device was not turned on. The wounds were left open between treatments.

  After day 14, all the wounds in the treated group were covered by a crust and had satisfactory healing, so the topical oxygen therapy and negative pressure were stopped.

  Each rabbit had its own disc and pipes for treatment. After every use, the shield and pipes were decontaminated by soaking in 10% povidone iodine solution for 20 minutes and washed with soap and water before finally being cleaned with 70% alcohol and left to dry.

  Wound assessment. The wound area was measured by placing a transparent film on the top of the wound and labeling it with a marker before photographing with a digital camera. The wound area was calculated using image analysis software, and photographs of the wounds were also recorded. The images were assessed on days 1, 2, 7, 14, and 21 after initial surgery, and wound closure was compared with the control group.

  For histology assessments, skin samples were taken from the wound area and the margin on days 7, 14, and 21 following injury. The samples were fixed with 10% formalin and processed to prepare paraffin blocks, and serial tissue sections were stained with hemotoxylin-eosin (HE) or Van Gieson. In each microscopic section, 2 regions of healthy skin area and 2 regions of wounded skin area were examined under the microscope.

Statistical Analysis

  The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the difference in wound area and wound closure. All analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 software.

Results

  Four rabbits in the control group and 3 rabbits in the intervention group died before study completion; these wounds were used in the comparison as long as the rabbits were alive, then the wounds in the rest of the rabbits were entered into the analysis. All the wounds were created in a similar manner, but widened a bit on their own based on the size and the posture of the rabbits during wound creation, so the final wounds were greater in size. The rabbits were randomly allocated to the treated or control group after wound creation, and Mann-Whitney test showed the wound area in the first day was not significantly different in the groups (Table 1). The wounds in the treated group healed faster than those in the control group (Table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2). After 3 days, there was a 30.1 ± 8.7 percent reduction in wound area in the treated group, while in the control group it was only 3 ± 13.4 percent (P = 0.0001). After 7 days, the wound closure in the treated group was 48.7 ± 11 percent, compared to 20.3 ± 18 percent in the control group (P = 0.0001). There was no wound infection in any of the rabbits.

  In the study of skin sections stained with HE after 7 days, there was an intact epithelium and hair follicles in the healthy area. In this area of the dermis region, thick collagen fibers were stained red and fibrocytes were dense and fusiform; in comparison, the wounded area showed no sign of epithelium, hair follicles, or thick collagen fibers. Instead, the wounded area contained an abundance of red blood cells, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells (Figure 3). Van Gieson staining showed collagen fibers as red with a yellow background, and the Van Gieson-stained slides clearly showed the different pattern of collagen distribution in the control and treated samples (Figure 3). In intact areas, collagen fibers were thick with fibrocyte within collagen bundles, but in wounded areas or healing regions, collagen fibers were in the form of thin and distributed fibers with fibroblasts between them. This specific staining verified the results deduced with HE slides.

  After 7 days, like the control samples, the treated slides clearly showed 2 healthy and 2 wounded areas. In the treated group, in addition to a thicker dermis, there was a growing epithelium in the wounded area, while in the control slides, there was no sign of the epithelium in the wounded area at this time (Figure 4).

  After 14 days, the control slides showed signs of growing epithelium in the wounded area. However, there was still dried blood in most of the wounded areas. In comparison to the control group slides, the slides from the treated group showed almost a complete epithelium on the wounded area. The dermis in the wounded area was thicker in the treated samples (Figure 4).

  Microscopic examination of the control and treated slides after 21 days showed no significant differences in terms of thickness of the dermis or epithelium in the healing region. In all 3 stages, the Van Gieson stained slides made it easy to compare the distribution of collagen fibers and of the epithelium (Figure 3).

Discussion

  Wounds are associated with potential morbidity, impaired quality of life, and significant economic costs. Any improvement that speeds up the wound healing process has great clinical benefits for patients and health systems.24 The results of this study showed a significant improvement in wound healing while using combination therapy. The topical combination therapy delivery device designed by the authors for the purposes of the study might be effective in full-thickness wound healing.

  Since the authors were not able to find a study with a similar device using a combination of 3 different parameters, results were compared with devices using 1 of the parameters. In this study, there was a 30.1% ± 8.7% reduction in wound area in the treated group after 3 days. Lee et al25compared the wound closure in different hydrogel compounds in full-thickness wounds in rats. Wound closure ranged from 20% to 30% on day 3 after surgery,25 which was comparable to the result in the treated group in the current study. Throusdale et al26 showed 40% wound closure in full-thickness wounds in rats 7 days after surgery,which was lower than the 47.8% wound closure in the treated group 7 days after surgery in the current study.

  There are a wide range of topical management options in wound care. Topical negative pressure has been used as a method of wound management for some years,12 and assists wound closure by applying localized negative pressure to the wound, promoting wound contraction and angiogenesis, and removing excess fluid.27 Topical negative pressure has been suggested to be of value in a variety of settings, ranging from management of acute wounds to ischemic and diabetic ulcers.27-29 Current indications for TNP dressings include pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, and open wounds.1,30

  A recent review summarizes the effect of TPN in clinical trials and confirms its benefit.8 Most of the studies included are clinical trials. In one trial study, 342 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups to compare the efficacy of TNP with advanced moist wound therapy (AMWT) to treat diabetic foot ulcers. Results showed that a greater proportion of foot ulcers achieved complete closure with TNP (73/169; 43.2%) than AMWT (48/166; 28.9%) within the 112-day active treatment phase (P = 0.007).31 One of the outcomes of TNP in the referenced clinical trials was a reduced wound size, which the authors observed in the current study results as well.

  Irrigation is a critical component of wound management.3 Studies have documented the efficacy of normal saline irrigation in decreasing wound infection rates.18,22 Wounds should be cleansed with a sufficient volume of irrigant to reduce or eliminate particulate matter and bacterial loads from the wound.22 Wounds traditionally are irrigated using a syringe and needle with manual injection of fluid, a time- and labor-intensive method.18 The designed device in this study can efficiently irrigate wounds with preregulated pressure, temperature, volume, and time. Further studies are needed to determine the advantage in clinical settings.

  The goal of oxygen therapy for wound care is to transfer sufficient oxygen to interstitial tissues to maintain a concentration near the 40 mm Hg found in healthy and well-perfused tissues.15 It has been commonly thought that skin receives its oxygen supply from internal circulation; however, recent investigations have shown that a significant amount of oxygen may enter the skin from the external overlying surface. It has now been shown that the oxygen penetration through > 700 (µm) of live human dermis can be achieved with both gaseous and topical dissolved oxygen delivery devices.15 There is currently some debate about using topical oxygen therapy in wound care. Many believe that topical oxygen therapy, which involves inserting the wounded limb into an airtight bag filled with oxygen under slightly elevated pressure, is clinically ineffective.1 However, some studies show that topical oxygen could improve the healing of venous ulcers, reduce recurrence rates, and alleviate pain.17

  Today, the principles of topical wound therapy involve elimination of necrotic tissue, control of bacterial loads, management of wound exudates, maintenance of open proliferative wound edges, and provision of a moist and protected wound surface.32 A single topical approach might not be able to achieve all the goals in wound care. The combination of therapies might accelerate the healing process. Hard-to-heal and sloughy wounds might benefit more from topical combination therapy.

Conclusion

  Most research focuses on the use of one topical treatment in wound care. The authors believe that a combination of topical methods (ie, irrigation, negative pressure, and oxygen therapy) might have synergistic effects and improve wound healing, and the results of this study support this assumption. More studies, especially in human beings and in clinical settings, are needed.

Acknowledgments

Rasoul Mokhtari, RN is from Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. Sayyed Alireza Talei, MS; and Mehdi Nouredini, PhD are from Physiology Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. Negin Masoudi Alavi, PhD; and Tahereh Mazoochi, PhD are from Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. Aliakbar Taherian, PhD is from Anatomical Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

Address correspondence to:
Negin Masoudi Alavi, PhD
Kashan University of Medical Sciences
Trauma Nursing Research Center
IRAN/Kashan
Ghotb Ravandi Highway
Kashan University of Medical Sciences
masoudialavi_N@kaums.ac.ir
alavi.negin@yahoo.com

Disclosure: The authors acknowledge this study was supported by the Research Deputy of Kashan University of Medical Sciences through grant no. 9022.

References

1. Fonder MA, Lazarus GS, Cowan DA, Aronson-Cook B, Kohli AR, Mamelak AJ. Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of non-healing wounds and wound care dressings.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(2):185-206. 2. Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care. 2009;18(4):4:154-161. 3. Valente JH, Forti RJ, Freundlich LF, Zandiehl SO, Crain EF. Wound irrigation in children: saline solution or tap water? Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(5):609-616. 4. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;203(1-3):93-98. 5. Becker DL, Thrasivoulou C, Phillips AR. Connexins in wound healing; perspectives in diabetic patients. Biochim Biophy Acta. 2012;1818(8):2068-2075. 6. Schäfer M, Werner S. Oxidative stress in normal and impaired wound repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58(2):165-171. 7. Bolton L, Fattu AJ. Topical agents and wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 1994;12(1):95-120. 8. Mouës CM, Heule F, Hovius SE. A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence? Am J Surg. 2011;201(4):544-556. 9. Hutchinson JJ, Lawrence JC. Wound infection under occlusive dressings. J Hosp Infect. 1991;17(2):83-94. 10. Cowan KN, Teague L, Sue SC, Mahoney JL. Vacuum-assisted wound closure of deep sternal infections in high-risk patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2205–2212. 11. Evans D, Land L. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds: a systematic review. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(3):238-242. 12. Fries CA, Jeffery SL, Kay AR. Topical negative pressure and military wounds-- a review of the evidence. Injury. 2011;42(5):436-440. 13. Caniano DA, Ruth B, Teich S. Wound management with vacuum-assisted closure: experience in 51 pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(1):128-132. 14. Petzina R, Ugander M, Gustafsson L, et al. Topical negative pressure therapy of a sternotomy wound increases sternal fluid content but does not affect internal thoracic artery blood flow: Assessment using magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(5):1007-1013. 15. Roe DF, Gibbins BL, Ladizinsky DA. Topical dissolved oxygen penetrates skin: model and method. J Surg Res. 2010;159(1):e29-e36. 16. Kalliainen LK, Gordillo GM, Schlanger R, Sen CK. Topical oxygen as an adjunct to wound healing: a clinical case series. Pathophysiology. 2003;9(2):81-87. 17. Tawfick W, Sultan S. Does topical wound oxygen (TWO2) offer an improved outcome over conventional compression dressings (CCD) in the management of refractory venous ulcers (RVU)? A parallel observational comparative study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(1):125-132. 18. Chisholm CD, Cordell WH, Rogers K, Woods JR. Comparison of a new pressurized saline canister versus syringe irrigation for laceration cleansing in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(11):1364-1367. 19. Dire DJ, Welsh AP. A comparison of wound irrigation solutions used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(6):704-708. 20. Bansal BC, Wiebe RA, Perkins SD, Abramo TJ. Tap water for irrigation of lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(5):469-472. 21. Morton LM, Phillips TJ. Wound healing update. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31(1):33-37. 22. Hussey M, Bagg M. Principles of wound closure. Operative Techniques Sports Med. 2011;19(4):206-211. 23. Farstvedt E, Stashak TS, Othic A. Update on topical wound medications. Clin Techniques Equine Pract. 2004;392):164-172. 24. Abdelrahman T, Newton H. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery. 2011;29(10):491-495. 25. Lee YH, Chang JJ, Yang MC, Chien CT, Lai WF. Acceleration of wound healing in diabetic rats by layered hydrogel dressing. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;88(3):809- 819. 26. Trousdale RK, Jacobs Sh, Simhaee DA, Wu JK, Lustbader J W. Wound closure and metabolic parameter variability in a db/db mouse model for diabetic ulcers. J Surg Res. 2009;151(1):100-107. 27. Barker JA, Carlson GL. Managing the open wound: indications for topical negative pressure therapy. Surgery. 2011;29(10):517-512. 28. Birke-Sorensen H, Malmsjo M, Rome P, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for negative pressure wound therapy: Treatment variables (pressure levels, wound filler and contact layer) e Steps towards an international consensus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64 Suppl:S1-S16. 29. Kasai Y, Nemoto H, Kimura N, Ito Y, Sumiya N. Application of low-pressure negative pressure wound therapy to ischaemic wounds. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(3):395-398. 30. Eisenhardt SU, Schmidt Y, Thiele JR, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the ischaemia/reperfusion-associated inflammatory response in free muscle flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(5):640-649. 31. Blume PA, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(4):631-636. 32. Del Rosso JQ. Wound care in the dermatology office: where are we in 2011? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(3 supl):S1-S7.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement