Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Peer Review

Peer Reviewed

Case Series

Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Pyoderma Gangrenosum With Viable Cryopreserved Umbilical Tissue: A Case Series

April 2020
1044-7946
Wounds 2020;32(4):101–106. Epub 2020 February 27

Abstract

Introduction. Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare skin disease that often presents as a uniquely painful and necrotic ulceration of the lower extremity. Pyoderma gangrenosum is often misdiagnosed and can have deleterious consequences to the patient, as there is no gold standard treatment and it can be difficult to manage. Surgery for these wounds is controversial, as pathergy can develop, worsening the ulceration. Advanced wound care products such as cellular- and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) are effective in helping stagnant chronic wounds reach full closure. Amnion/chorion-based skin substitutes that have been cryopreserved and contain viable cells have been shown to promote more cell recruitment and reduce inflammation. Objective. This case series presents evidence of using a cryopreserved umbilical cord tissue with living cells in adjunctive treatment of wounds associated with PG. Materials and Methods. This report presents 3 different clinical scenarios of lower extremity PG treated surgically with viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue (vCUT). Results. All 3 patients were successfully treated with vCUT and resulted in complete healing. Conclusions. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first case series demonstrating the ability of vCUT to heal these difficult-to-treat ulcers. In addition, it may be an effective modality to adjunctive management of PG.

Introduction

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare skin disease that often presents as a uniquely painful and necrotic ulceration of the lower extremity. Histologically, it is characterized by an increased number of neutrophils in the dermis in the absence of infection.1,2 About half of PG cases are associated with systemic diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, polyarthritis, and hematologic disorders.3 The pathogenesis of PG remains poorly understood, but it is thought to be a multifactorial combination of neutrophil dysfunction, inflammatory mediators, and genetic predisposition.4 This supports the theory that PG is a hyperreactive response to inflammation and trauma in predisposed patients.5 Currently, there are no specific lab tests or histopathologic exams to confirm PG, and it is usually a diagnosis of exclusion.6 As many as 10% of PG cases may be misdiagnosed, with mimickers including vascular occlusive disease or venous disease, vasculitis, cancer, primary infection, necrotizing fasciitis, exogenous tissue injury, or other inflammatory diseases.5 The misdiagnosis of PG can have grave consequences, because treatment intended for PG with high-dose prednisone or immunosuppressive medications may be contraindicated in patients with diseases that may produce ulceration-mimicking PG, such as an infectious or malignant process.7

There is no gold standard treatment for PG, and it can be difficult to manage.8-10 The management goals are to control local and systemic inflammation and improve wound healing. Most treatment regimens involve both topical and systemic immunosuppressants with appropriate wound care and pain management.11 Commonly used agents include systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, infliximab, and canakinumab, primarily targeting the inflammatory response.12 Recently, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have been used for refractory PG.8,13,14 Initial improvement of ulcers may occur within days of starting treatment, but complete ulcer healing often requires weeks to months.8,13,14 Therefore, there remains a high rate of nonresponse and recurrence.

Surgical management of PG ulcers is divisive, with 25% to 50% of these cases potentially exhibiting pathergy in which a minor trauma can lead to the development of ulcers that may be resistant to healing.15 Pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers can be aggravated by surgery, which is often a hallmark when considering the diagnosis of PG. Pathergy may be mediated by ensuring the patient’s PG is clinically dormant prior to surgery.16,17 Select literature supports surgical intervention in conjunction with medical management in the forms of free-flaps, split-thickness skin grafts, and cultured keratinocyte autografts.18-20

Advanced wound care products such as cellular- and/or tissue-based products are effective in helping stagnant chronic wounds reach full closure. The benefits of using human placental tissues in tissue regeneration are now well documented.21,22 Optimally preserved placental membranes are of particular interest, as they contain a combination of growth factors and extracellular matrices as well as viable mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells. These components have been shown to decrease inflammation,23 lower microbial loads,24 and promote tissue regeneration.25 Furthermore, amnion/chorion-based skin substitutes that have been cryopreserved and contain viable cells have been shown to promote more cell recruitment and reduce inflammation better than devitalized placental membranes.26,27 This consecutive case series presents evidence of using a cryopreserved umbilical cord tissue with living cells in treating patients diagnosed with PG.

Materials and Methods

All 3 patients had a chronic wound, a diagnosis of PG, and failed standard of care (SOC) treatments. They then were treated with either 1 or 2 applications of viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue allograft (vCUT; Stravix; Osiris Therapeutics, Inc, Columbia, MD) that were applied to the patients’ chronic wounds in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines, followed by standard of care for the specific wound. Each wound area was serially photographed and measured at subsequent office visits.

Results

Case 1
A 61-year-old woman, with a past medical history of allergic rhinitis, underwent a standard bunionectomy with screw fixation without any intraoperative issues. At 4-days postoperatively, she developed a fever of 100.7°F despite being on per-protocol prophylactic 500 mg of oral cephalexin 3 times daily for 1 week, while noticing increasing pain at the procedure site. At 6-days postop in the surgeon’s office, the incision was evaluated, and drained, and the wound culture was sent. She was immediately admitted to the emergency department with an elevated temperature of 102.5°F and initial white blood cell (WBC) count of 14 900, with neutrophils 82%. A formal incision and drainage (I&D) in the operating room (OR) was performed the same evening for suspected infection and abscess. She was started on 1 g of vancomycin every 24 hours and 3.375 g of piperacillin/tazobactam every 6 hours after the procedure, and an infectious disease consultation was ordered.

The patient continued to experience pain and elevated temperatures after the initial I&D, and surrounding skin necrosis formed shortly after. She underwent a subsequent washout and debridement 2 days later, in which all necrotic tissue was removed, multiple deep tissue and wound cultures were taken, and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) at 125 mm Hg continuous pressure was applied. In addition, 600 mg of intravenous (IV) clindamycin administered every 8 hours was added to the antibiotic regimen. Following the procedure, she still remained febrile to 102.4°F with a WBC of 13 800 and neutrophils 77%. As she was not improving clinically and her wound continued to worsen, concern developed for a necrotizing infection. The patient underwent a third surgical debridement, with cyanotic changes noted to the hallux. Cultures were taken at that point as well.

At this time, multiple wound and tissue cultures obtained from the office and OR did not grow any microbes. Surgical pathology showed gangrenous necrosis with abscess. There was now suspicion of PG, given her worsening clinical picture despite multiple debridement and antibiotic coverage, negative cultures, increasing leukocytosis to 22 300, and neutrophilia at 90%. Dermatology was consulted and agreed with the working diagnosis of PG in light of the aforementioned findings. The patient then was started on 60 mg of methylprednisolone daily. Rheumatology also was consulted for evaluation of a possible underlying autoimmune/vasculitic etiology. A full workup followed, with all rheumatologic serologies being negative. Serial radiographic images showed no concern for acute osteomyelitis and intraoperative examination of the osteotomy, and fixation was deemed very stable, thus the hardware was not removed.

The patient failed to show significant improvement despite high-dose (60 mg) IV methylprednisolone every 24 hours, with a WBC of 21 750 and consistent neutrophilia in the 90%. She was transitioned to infliximab infusions 5 mg/kg on weeks 0, 2, 6, and 8 and with low-dose (5 mg) methotrexate weekly for 8 weeks with low-dose methotrexate for 6 months, as these agents have a more acceptable side effect profile.12 During the following daily inpatient clinical exams, the ulcer demonstrated increased granulation without purulence. She was discharged to a rehabilitation facility with continued infliximab infusions with low-dose methotrexate as per the aforementioned schedule. 

A multidisciplinary decision was reached to apply a vCUT allograft to the wound bed. The patient demonstrated continued clinical improvement with decreased pain, and the ulcer completely closed with SOC with nonadhesive dressings and hydrogel. The cyanotic changes to the hallux also improved greatly and did not require any further surgical intervention or amputation. Complete time to total healing was about 7 months after initial presentation (Figure 1).

 

Case 2
A 73-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension, mantle cell lymphoma of the lacrimal gland (treated with chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation), and prostate cancer was evaluated for a chronic, nonhealing ulcer of the right anterior tibia. The wound was present for 6 months, was increasing in size, and had failed conservative topical care with antibiotic ointment. A diagnosis of PG was confirmed via biopsy at an outside facility prior to referral. The patient had a history of infection to the area that was treated with IV antibiotics. He also was referred to vascular surgery for testing, which provided a benign vascular exam.

On initial physical exam, the ulcer was a Wagner Grade 1/2, measuring 3.5 cm x 3.0 cm x 0.3 cm. The patient was scheduled for debridement in the OR, application of vCUT allograft, and application of NPWT at 125 mm Hg continuous pressure, which was performed without complication. Surgical pathology yielded granulation tissue. At the 1-week postop exam, the ulcer was a Grade 1, measuring 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 0.1cm, with granulation and contraction of the wound periphery noted. Negative pressure wound therapy was continued for 3 weeks. Upon discontinuation of NPWT, local wound care was continued with hydrogel and dry sterile dressings. He was followed in the office monthly with continued granulation and contraction noted. About 20-weeks postop, the ulcer measured 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.0 cm. At 8-months postop, the ulcer had fully healed (Figure 2). 

 

Case 3
A 55-year old woman with a past medical history of type 2 diabetes presented with a biopsy-confirmed, nonhealing PG ulcer of the right dorsal forefoot that had been present for 1 year. Previous physicians had offered her a transmetatarsal amputation, but she wanted an alternative solution. At the time of original presentation, she had palpable pedal pulses, an elevated WBC of 14 000, normal temperature, C-reactive protein (CRP) of 15.2, and hemoglobin A1C of 9.8%. The ulcer measured 7.5 cm x 5.5 cm in diameter and extended to the level of tendon and bone. An x-ray could not rule out bone infection. Debridement of necrotic tissue and tendons was performed in the OR, in addition to a bone biopsy. A bilayer matrix dressing (Integra Bilayer Wound Matrix; Integra LifeSciences, Inc, Plainsboro, NJ) was applied under close follow-up with the infectious disease team. The bone biopsy was positive for osteomyelitis, and she was treated with 6 weeks of 3.375 g of IV piperacillin/tazobactam every 8 hours via a peripherally inserted central catheter line. Clinical improvement was noted when the silicone top-layer was removed 4 weeks after surgery, with a repeat CRP value of 2. The wound stalled at a size of 4.0 cm x 2.0 cm with mixed granular/fibrotic tissue. 

At 8 weeks following index surgery, vCUT was applied in the OR in conjunction with a NPWT dressing. The patient soon developed a PG flare-up, and rheumatology started her on 60 mg of oral methylprednisolone daily. Subsequently, the wound size increased, became infected, and the graft was deemed nonviable. After consultation with rheumatology, the steroids were stopped, and the patient was started on methotrexate. She began a 6-week course of 300 mg of oral clindamycin every 8 hours after a deep tissue culture was performed. After 3 months, a second application of vCUT under a NPWT dressing was applied. 

Six weeks after the second vCUT application, the ulcer demonstrated granulation tissue, decreased in size to 2.0 cm x 1.0 cm with minimal depth, and was treated with SOC until full epithelialization occurred. Total time to healing was 21 months from initial presentation (Figure 3). The patient is working full-time and ambulating in a diabetic shoe at the time of this publication. 

Discussion

Pyoderma gangrenosum is an idiopathic, inflammatory, ulcerative condition with a poorly understood pathogenesis. There is no gold standard treatment for PG, and it can be difficult to manage. Most treatment regimens involve both topical and systemic immunosuppressants with appropriate wound care and pain management. Surgical intervention is decided on a case-by-case basis and, for difficult or refractory cases, is done in conjunction with strict medical management.6,7,9

While most reported studies13,22 have been on diabetic and venous leg ulcers, amniotic membranes (eg, vCUT) also have been shown to be effective in other types of chronic wounds, including PG. In a study by Gruss and Jirsch,28 the authors treated a patient who developed PG after a total proctocolectomy for Crohn’s disease and was completely resistant to all forms of treatment for 18 months. Treatment with placental membrane relieved the patient’s pain; within 6 weeks, the wound reduced in size by 66%. In another study,19 a cryopreserved placental membrane was used to treat a 68-year-old patient with a history of lymphedema, diabetes, venous insufficiency, and a recurrent PG ulcer with an area of 115 cm2. At the time of that publication, the ulcer achieved 64% closure after 9 weekly applications, and treatment was ongoing.19 

The present study reports treating a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with PG with a cryopreserved umbilical cord tissue with living cells. While umbilical cord and placental membranes both have mesenchymal stem cells, which are well known to have immunosuppressive26,29-32 and antimicrobial properties,33-35 umbilical cord is also a rich source of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HC-HA) and pentraxin 3 (PTX3). The HC-HA/PTX3 has a unique ability to promote the death of activated macrophages while downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and upregulating anti-inflammatory cytokines.36-40 In addition, umbilical cord tissue is thicker and can be sutured, which may provide an advantage for application on deeper wounds.

Limitations

The limitations of this type of study include limited sample size and difficulty in diagnosing PG. Not all PG ulcers are amenable to surgery, but in those that are, vCUT may be a viable option for wound coverage.

Conclusions

In cases in which nonoperative management of PG does not improve the lesions alone, surgical management may need to be employed. The present report presents 3 different clinical scenarios of lower extremity PG that underwent treatment with vCUT and resulted in complete healing. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first case series demonstrating the ability of vCUT to heal these difficult-to-treat ulcers. In addition, it may be an effective modality to adjunctive management of PG. 

Acknowledgments

Authors: Robert Fridman, DPM, FACFAS, CWSP1; Tzvi Bar-David, DPM, FACFAS1; Joseph Larsen, DPM, FACFAS2; and Andrew R. Olson, DPM3

Affiliations: 1Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; 2ProHealth Care, New Hyde Park, NY; and 3New York-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, NY

Correspondence: Robert Fridman, DPM, FACFAS, CWSP, 60 East 56th Street, New York, NY 10022; rfridmandpm@aol.com; rf2256@cumc.columbia.edu 

Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest. 

References

1. Vignon-Pennamen MD. The extracutaneous involvement in the neutrophilic dermatoses. Clin Dermatol. 2000;18(3):339–347.

2. Hickman JG. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Clin Dermatol. 1983;1(1):102–113.

3. DeFilippis EM, Feldman SR, Huang WW. The genetics of pyoderma gangrenosum and implications for treatment: a systematic review [published online February 27, 2015]. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(6):1487–1497.

4. Braswell SF. Pathophysiology of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG): an updated review [published online August 5, 2015]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(4):691–698.

5. Weenig RH, Davis MD, Dahl PR, Su WP. Skin ulcers misdiagnosed as pyoderma gangrenosum. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(18):1412–1418.

6. Alavi A, French LE, Davis MD, Brassard A, Kirshner RS. Pyoderma gangrenosum: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18(3): 355–372.

7. Ahronowitz I, Harp J, Shinkai K (2012) Etiology and management of pyoderma gangrenosum: a comprehensive review. Am J Clin Derm. 2012;13(3):191–211.

8. Partridge ACR, Bai JW, Rosen CF, Walsh SR, Gulliver WP, Fleming P. Effectiveness of systemic treatments for pyoderma gangrenosum: a systematic review of observational studies and clinical trials [published online June 6, 2018]. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):290–295.

9. Miller J, Yentzer BA, Clark A, Jorizzo JL, Feldman SR. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a review and update on new therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(4):646–654.

10. Ormerod AD, Thomas KS, Craig FE, et al; UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP Team. Comparison of the two most commonly used treatments for pyoderma gangrenosum: results of the STOP GAP randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015;350:h2958.

11. von den Driesch P. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a report of 44 cases with follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137(6):1000–1005.

12. Brooklyn T, Dunnill G, Probert C. Diagnosis and treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum. BMJ. 2006;333(7560):181–184.

13. Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al; Grafix Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Grafix® for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi‐centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial [published online July 21, 2014]. Int Wound J. 2014;11(5):554–560.

14. Ehling A, Karrer S, Klebl F, Schäffler A, Müller-Ladner U. Therapeutic management of pyoderma gangrenosum. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(10):3076–3084.

15. Reichrath J, Bens G, Bonowitz A, Tilgen W. Treatment recommendations for pyoderma gangrenosum: an evidence-based review of the literature based on more than 350 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(2):273–283.

16. Ma G, Jones G, MacKay G. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a great marauder. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(5):546–552.

17. Kaddoura IL, Amm C. A rationale for adjuvant surgical intervention in pyoderma gangrenosum. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(1):23–28.

18. Long CC, Jessop J, Young M, Holt PJ. Minimizing the risk of post-operative pyoderma gangrenosum. Br J Dermatol. 1992;127(1):45–48.

19. Límová M, Mauro T. Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum with cultured keratinocyte autografts. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20(12):833–836.

20. Classen DA, Thomson C. Free flap coverage of pyoderma gangrenosum leg ulcers [published online July 16, 2002]. J Cutan Med Surg. 2002;6(4):327–331.

21. Gottrup F, Karlsmark T. Leg ulcers: uncommon presentations. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(6):601–611.

22. Anselmo DS, McGuire JB, Love E, Vlahovic T. Application of viable cryopreserved human placental membrane grafts in the treatment of wounds of diverse etiologies: a case series. Wounds. 2018;30(3):57–61.

23. Maxson S, Lopez EA, Yoo D, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Leroux MA. Concise review: role of mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1(2):142–149.

24. Singer NG, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:457–478.

25. Mei SH, Haitsma JJ, Dos Santos CC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis [published online June 17, 2010]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(8):1047–1057.

26. Newman RE, Yoo D, LeRoux MA, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A. Treatment of inflammatory diseases with mesenchymal stem cells. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009;8(2):110–123.

27. Duan-Arnold Y, Gyurdieva A, Johnson A, Uveges TE, Jacobstein DA, Danilkovitch A. Retention of endogenous viable cells enhances the anti-inflammatory activity of cryopreserved amnion. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(9):523–533.

28. Gruss JS, Jirsch DW. Human amniotic membrane: a versatile wound dressing. Can Med Assoc J. 1978;118(10):1237–1246.

29. Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells [published online July 30, 2007]. Blood. 2007;110(10):3499–3506.

30. Abumaree MH, Abomaray FM, Alshabibi MA, AlAskar AS, Kalionis B. Immunomodulatory properties of human placental mesenchymal stem/stromal cells [published online April 7, 2017]. Placenta. 2017;59:87–95.

31. Witherel CE, Yu T, Concannon M, Dampier W, Spiller KL. Immunomodulatory effects of human cryopreserved viable amniotic membrane in a pro-inflammatory environment in vitro [published online August 4, 2017]. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2017;10(5):451–462.

32. Wang Y, Chen X, Cao W, Shi Y. Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(11):1009–1016.

33. Mao Y, Hoffman T, Singh-Varma A, et al. Antimicrobial peptides secreted from human cryopreserved viable amniotic membrane contribute to its antibacterial activity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13722.

34. Mao Y, Singh-Varma A, Hoffman T, Dhall S, Danilkovitch A, Kohn J. The effect of cryopreserved human placental tissues on biofilm formation of wound-associated pathogens. J Funct Biomater. 2018;9(1):3.

35. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E, Finkelstein Y, Zohar Y Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta. 1991;12(3):285–288.

36. Cooke M, Tan EK, Mandrycky C, He H, O’Connell J, Tseng SC. Comparison of cryopreserved amniotic membrane and umbilical cord tissue with dehydrated amniotic membrane/chorion tissue. J Wound Care. 2014;23(10):465–474, 476.

37. He H, Li W, Tseng DY, et al. Biochemical characterization and function of complexes formed by hyaluronan and the heavy chains of inter-alpha-inhibitor (HC*HA) purified from extracts of human amniotic membrane [published online June 2, 2009]. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(30):20136–20146.

38. He H, Zhang S, Tighe S, Son J, Tseng SC. Immobilized heavy chain-hyaluronic acid polarizes lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages toward M2 phenotype [published online July 22, 2013]. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(36):25792–25803.

39. He H, Tan Y, Duffort S, Perez VL, Tseng SC. In vivo downregulation of innate and adaptive immune responses in corneal allograft rejection by HC-HA/PTX3 complex purified from amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(3):1647–1656.

40. Zhang S, Zhu YT, Chen SY, He H, Tseng SC. Constitutive expression of pentraxin 3 (PTX3) protein by human amniotic membrane cells leads to formation of the heavy chain (HC)-hyaluronan (HA)-PTX3 complex [published online March 20, 2014]. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(19):13531–13542.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement