Nonsurgical Management of Pressure Injury With a New Silicone Rubber Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation Device: A Case Report
© 2025 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved.
Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of Wound Management & Prevention or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.
Abstract
Background. Surgical debridement and flap-based reconstruction are essential procedures for managing stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries (PIs). However, the recurrence of PIs after flap reconstruction is high; moreover, many patients cannot tolerate surgical management. Case Report. An 81-year-old male presented with 3 stage 4 PIs (1 each on the sacral region and heels) that were successfully treated without surgical management. The patient was bedridden with progressive dementia, pneumonia, and malnutrition. He could not tolerate thorough debridement. A new silicone rubber negative pressure drainage tube with instillation device was applied to the wounds on the right heel, left heel, and sacral region for 20, 25, and 80 days, respectively, until the wounds were filled with healthy granulation tissue. This device comprises a principal, a connector, an instillation, and a negative pressure drainage tube. The principal part of the device is made of medical-grade silicone rubber shaped into a columnar structure; there is also an instillation channel in the center of the principal tube, forming an instillation loop and ensuring the whole wound is thoroughly instilled. The wounds treated in this case healed without thorough debridement or flap-based reconstruction and had not recurred as of 1-year follow-up. Conclusion. Wound healing was achieved without thorough debridement or flap reconstruction, using a new silicone rubber anti-blocking negative pressure wound therapy with instillation device that was able to remove thick exudate and slough.
Abbreviations: NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; NPWTi-d, NPWT with instillation and dwell time; PI, pressure injury; ROCF-CC, reticulated open cell foam dressing with through holes; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation.
Background
Stage 3 and 4 PIs pose a significant health care problem that can decrease patient quality of life and increase mortality rates.1,2 A 2015 study revealed that the mortality rate among patients with stage 3 and 4 PIs treated at a hospital in Jerusalem, Israel, was as high as 72%.3 Meanwhile, a recent study reports that the cost of stage 3 and 4 PIs in the United States amounts to more than $13.4 billion annually.4
Stage 3 and 4 PIs are commonly managed by surgical debridement and flap-based reconstruction5; however, the recurrence of PIs after flap reconstruction is nearly 70%.6 In addition, flap reconstruction can only be performed on a clean wound with healthy granulation tissue.7 Most patients need to undergo a drastic wound debridement prior to flap reconstruction, but many are unable to tolerate surgical management because of poor nutritional status, severe infection, and various complications. NPWTi-d with a ROCF-CC may be a suitable alternative for wound cleaning in complex cases with thick exudate and slough when complete surgical debridement is not possible or appropriate.8-10 However, the recommended duration for using NPWTi-d with ROCF-CC is no more than 9 days, in order to avoid growth of granulation tissue into the dressing and resultant pain at dressing changes.11 Moreover, patients still require flap reconstruction to repair the PI after NPWTi-d.
The patient described herein was treated with an NPWTi-d device designed by the author (Y. Zhai) that uses silicone rubber as the primary material and has a unique column structure. The device was able to remove thick wound exudate continuously without blockage, and the granulation tissue did not grow into the dressing. The results reveal a positive effect of this new anti-blocking negative pressure drainage tube with instillation device on a complex PI without the need for surgical management.
Case Reports
An 81-year-old male presented with 3 stage 4 PIs—1 sacral, 1 on the right heel, and 1 on the left heel—that had been present for 6 months. At the time he transferred to the authors’ hospital, he had not eaten for 1 week. His previous medical history included hypertension and advanced dementia. He had been bedridden for 5 years.
The patient’s vital signs were monitored at presentation to the hospital, revealing a temperature of 37.1°C, heart rate of 96 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 24 breaths per minute, systolic blood pressure of 150 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of 60 mm Hg, and SpO2 of 89%. The laboratory examination showed a high leukocyte count, a high level of C-reactive protein (91.3 mg/L), and hypoalbuminemia (23.0 g/L) (Table).
The Mini Nutritional Assessment score was 3 (on a scale of 0 to 14, a score < 7 means malnutrition), and a chest computed tomography scan revealed evidence of pneumonia. There was a 15-cm × 10-cm–diameter eschar on the sacral region (Figure 1A), a 4-cm × 3-cm–diameter eschar on the right heel (Figure 1B), and a 4-cm × 6-cm–diameter eschar on the left heel (Figure 1C). The wounds produced exudate and a strong odor, and the skin surrounding the wounds was red and swollen. The ankle-brachial index was 0.98 for the right leg and 0.97 for the left leg. Arterial lower limb Doppler ultrasonography showed lower limb arterial plaque, but no stenosis or occlusion.
After the patient’s admission to the hospital, consistent and permanent pressure relief was achieved by changing his position every 2 to 3 hours during the day and night. Due to swallowing impairment, nasogastric feeding was used to provide nutrition. Antibiotic treatment was administered for 14 days. Due to his progressive dementia, pneumonia, low SpO2, severe hypoalbuminemia, and malnutrition, the patient was considered unable to tolerate surgical management.
The eschars were removed at the bedside without thorough debridement. The PIs extended to deep fascia, muscle, and bones. The new NPWTi-d device (Rongke [Suzhou] Medical Technology Company, Ltd), which uses silicone rubber as the primary material, was applied to the wounds (Figure 1D-F). The silicone rubber dressings were placed on the wound beds and sealed with a medical-grade transparent film; the dressings were changed every 5 days. Negative pressure was set at −125 mm Hg. The wounds were washed with 1000 mL of normal saline every 24 hours.
About 30% of the nonviable tissues had been removed and replaced by healthy granulation tissue at the first dressing change 5 days after initial application of the new anti-blocking negative pressure drainage tube with instillation device (Figure 1G-I). On day 15, the wound beds on the sacral region and right heel were covered with healthy granulation tissue. The wound bed on the left heel was covered with healthy granulation tissue by day 20. The PIs gradually shrank in size with the consecutive application of the new device. The wounds on the right heel, left heel, and sacral region were filled with healthy granulation tissue by day 20 (Figure 1K), day 25 (Figure 1L), and day 80 (Figure 1J), respectively. Subsequently, the device was no longer used, and the wounds were treated with conventional moist wound dressings. Complete wound healing was achieved on the right heel, left heel, and sacral region on day 28 (Figure 1N), day 32 (Figure 1O), and day 96 (Figure 1M), respectively. The PIs had not recurred as of 1-year follow-up (Figure 1P-R).
Discussion
Stage 3 and 4 PIs pose a severe clinical challenge because of the presence of complex chronic diseases and poor nutritional status. Management of such injuries requires numerous dressing changes, which are typically helpful if patients cannot tolerate sharp debridement and flap-based reconstruction. Consequently, new therapeutic approaches for this patient population are being explored.
It is well known that NPWT is widely applied for managing stage 3 and 4 PIs after debridement to promote the formation of granulation tissue and prepare for flap reconstruction.12-15 However, NPWT is not recommended for PIs in the absence of debridement, because the holes in NPWT dressings can be easily blocked by thick exudate and necrotic debris, even with additional fluid instillation.16,17
In the current case, a new anti-blocking negative pressure drainage tube with instillation device was applied to the ulcers. This device was first used for an infected wound after internal fixation of a fracture, and that wound healed without radical debridement or removal of the internal fixation. Next, the authors of the current article successfully cured an infected complex calciphylaxis wound.18 In vitro experiments showed that the new silicone rubber negative pressure dressing presented better anti-blocking properties than the polyurethane foams (data not shown).
The new device discussed herein comprises a principal, a connector, an instillation, and a negative pressure drainage tube (Figure 2).
The principal tube is made of medical-grade silicone rubber; its central part is an instillation channel connected to the instillation tube, covered with columnar structures. The connector tube joins the remaining tubes to ensure optimal fluid flow under negative pressure. The steps in applying the device are shown in Figure 3.
The smooth surface of the new device dressing discourages adherence of thick wound exudate and necrotic debris, and the unique columnar structure provides sufficient space for their passage, thus preventing any blockages. The unique columnar structure of the new device also provides sufficient space for granulation growth, and its smooth surface prevents granulation from adhering, thus preventing pain and bleeding during dressing changes. The additional instillation feature of the new system differs from traditional NPWTi-d in that the water outlet is located away from the end of the negative pressure tube (Figure 2), thus ensuring the whole wound bed is thoroughly instilled.
Limitations
The current case report has limitations. Only 1 patient was studied. The evidence concerning the effectiveness of the device is low due to a lack of controlled trials. More cases and large randomized clinical studies are needed to further assess the efficacy of the new anti-blocking negative pressure drainage tube with instillation device and to optimize the clinical parameters.
Conclusion
The current article reports a patient with 3 PIs that were successfully treated using a new silicone rubber NPWT with instillation device without surgical management. The device was applied to the wounds for up to 80 days (in the case of the sacral wound), until the wounds were filled with healthy granulation tissue. Dressing change was done every 5 days. There was no blockage during the procedure, and no pain or bleeding during the dressing changes, which is believed to be due to the device’s smooth silicone rubber surface, unique columnar structure, and instillation loop. Additional studies with more patients are needed to further assess the efficacy of this new device.
Author & Publication Information
Authors: Yaping Zhu, MM; Xiuzhen Zhang, BMed; Yufan Zhang, MM; Xiaojuan Zhong, BMed; Xiangyue Lu, BMed; and Yanrong Zhai, MM
Affiliation: Department of Wound Repair, Suzhou Wuzhong People’s Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Author Contributions: Writing and editing: Y. Zhu, Y. Zhai. Data curation: X. Zhang, Y. Zhang. Manufacture of the anti-blocking negative pressure drainage tube with instillation system: Y. Zhai, Y. Zhu, X. Zhong, X. Lu. Collecting information: Y. Zhu, Y. Zhai, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhong, X. Lu. Authors Y. Zhu and X. Zhang contributed equally to this work.
ORCID: Zhai, 0000-0001-6478-0470; Zhu, 0009-0007-2638-5200
Ethical Approval: Consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for the publication of this case and its associated images.
Disclosure: This work was supported by Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Suzhou (SKY2022033). The authors disclose no other conflicts of interest.
Correspondence: Yanrong Zhai, MM; Department of Wound Repair, Suzhou Wuzhong People’s Hospital, Soochow North Road, 61, 215128, China; zhaiyanrong1885@126.com
Manuscript Accepted: October 10, 2024
References
1. Song YP, Shen HW, Cai JY, Zha ML, Chen HL. The relationship between pressure injury complication and mortality risk of older patients in follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2019;16(6):1533-1544. doi:10.1111/iwj.13243
2. Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, et al; DecubICUs Study Team; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Trials Group Collaborators. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(2):160-169. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9
3. Jaul E, Calderon-Margalit R. Systemic factors and mortality in elderly patients with pressure ulcers. Int Wound J. 2015;12(3):254-259. doi:10.1111/iwj.12086
4. Gould LJ, Alderden J, Aslam R, et al. WHS guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers-2023 update. Wound Repair Regen. 2024;32(1):6-33. doi:10.1111/wrr.13130
5. Awad SS, Stern JD, Milne CT, et al. Surgical reconstruction of stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries: a literature review and proposed algorithm from an interprofessional working group. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2023;36(5):249-258. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000922708.95424.88
6. Pan NF, Liang ZH, Lin P, et al. Influence factors of poor efficacy after flap repair operation in patients with pressure ulcers. Article in Chinese. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2022;38(12):1156-1161. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220228-00041
7. Norman G, Wong JK, Amin K, Dumville JC, Pramod S. Reconstructive surgery for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;10(10):CD012032. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012032.pub3
8. Fernández LG, Matthews MR, Ellman C, Jackson P, Villarreal DH, Norwood S. Use of reticulated open cell foam dressings with through holes during negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time: a large case study. Wounds. 2020;32(10):279-282.
9. Faust E, Opoku-Agyeman JL, Behnam AB. Use of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(1S-1):16S-26S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007607
10. Scarpa C, Grigatti M, Rizzato S, Crema A, Vindigni V, Bassetto F. Novel foam dressing with through holes and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time: a retrospective cohort study. Wounds. 2024;36(3):67-72. doi:10.25270/wnds/23081
11. Téot L, Boissiere F, Fluieraru S. Novel foam dressing using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation to remove thick exudate. Int Wound J. 2017;14(5):842-848. doi:10.1111/iwj.12719
12. Song YP, Wang L, Yuan BF, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy for III/IV pressure injuries: a meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29(1):20-33. doi:10.1111/wrr.12863
13. Arowojolu OA, Wirth GA. Sacral and ischial pressure ulcer management with negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(1S-1):61S-67S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007613
14. Shi J, Gao Y, Tian J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;5(5):CD011334. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011334.pub3
15. Zhao Y, Zhang M, Zhang C, Yan H. Effect of local oxygen therapy combined with vacuum sealing drainage on the healing of stage IV sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers. Int Wound J. 2023;20(10):4253-4261. doi:10.1111/iwj.14327
16. Şahin E, Rizalar S, Özker E. Effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy compared to wet-dry dressing in pressure injuries. J Tissue Viability. 2022;31(1):164-172. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.007
17. Yu L, Wang Y, Ma D, et al. In-hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: a meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;20(8):3371-3379. doi:10.1111/iwj.14169
18. Jin Y, Zhai Y, Fan M, Li X. Successful treatment of an infected wound involving calciphylaxis via vacuum sealing drainage: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;105:108008. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108008