Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Original Research

Edaravone, a Free Radical Scavenger, Accelerates Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice

June 2014
1044-7946
WOUNDS. 2014;26(6):163-171.

Abstract

Refractory wound healing is a major complication of diabetes, which restricts wound healing by interfering with the inflammatory response, decreasing granulation, causing peripheral neuropathy, and inhibiting angiogenesis. Oxidative stress has been proposed as an important pathogenic factor in diabetic wound complications. Edaravone (3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one) is a strong free radical scavenger that suppresses the effect of oxidative stress. Material and Methods. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes was established in adult C57BL/6 mice, and full-thickness skin was then removed from the dorsomedial back using an 8-mm biopsy punch. Edaravone or vehicle alone was applied to the wound on day 0 and day 4 after wound creation. The wound was monitored with a digital camera and analyzed on days 0, 4, and 7 after wound creation. Results. This study investigated whether accelerated wound closure occurred in the edaravone group (n = 24) compared with the vehicle-alone group (n = 15). On day 7, wound closure between the 2 groups was statistically different (P = 0.0019). Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis were markedly promoted. The possibility of an inhibitory effect of edaravone characterized by suppression of oxidative stress was explored. Edaravone-induced upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) mRNA expression, and eNOS protein was immunohistochemically detected. Conclusion. Edaravone upregulates eNOS expression and accelerates wound healing.

Introduction

  The number of patients with diabetes is multiplying worldwide.1 Accordingly, impaired wound healing, one of its complications, has been receiving increasing attention. Following skin injury, the wound goes through 4 often-overlapping phases: coagulation, inflammation, new tissue formation, and tissue remodeling.2 This wound healing process requires orderly events among cells, inflammatory mediators, cytokines, hormones, and growth factors. In patients with diabetes, however, this integrated progression is impaired because of several pathogenic abnormalities, including dysfunction of neovascularization. Neovascularization occurs by 2 processes: angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. In angiogenesis, new vessels are formed from preexisting mature vessels. In contrast, vasculogenesis requires both adjacent existing blood vessels and bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).3

  Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes are characterized by hyperglycemia, which is accountable for intracellular hyperglycemia in susceptible cells, such as endothelial cells. Although hyperglycemia causes tissue damage through 5 pathways, it has recently been demonstrated that mitochondrial overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the single upstream event common to these 5 pathways.4 Reactive oxygen species are necessary in wound healing for efficient defense against invading pathogens and successful cellular signaling. However, if produced excessively or not properly detoxified, this oxidative stress leads to cell damage. In the diabetic microvasculature, overproduction of ROS leads to impaired angiogenesis, resulting in delayed wound healing.4 In addition, lymphangiogenesis is reduced in diabetic wounds.5 Lymphatic vessels are important for the maintenance of proper interstitial fluid pressure and serve as the primary passage of lymph fluid as well as a location for immune functions to take place. Lymphangiogenesis in adulthood occurs under pathological conditions, including tissue repair.6 In diabetic mice, reduced lymphangiogenesis and weakened macrophage function have been demonstrated to contribute to impaired wound healing.7

   Edaravone (3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one) is an antioxidant used to treat acute cerebral infraction, and it was initially approved in Japan by the Ministry of Health as a commercially available treatment.8 Edaravone also reportedly reduces the increased amount of ROS induced by postischemic reperfusion9 and induces endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in the ischemic spinal cord in rabbits.10

  This study was performed to investigate whether topical application of edaravone accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice, mainly focusing on neovascularization.

Material and Methods

  Animals. C57BL/6 male mice aged 9-10 weeks were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Japan, Inc (Yokohama, Japan). At 10-11 weeks of age, the mice were rendered diabetic by intraperitoneal injection of 60 mg/kg of streptozotocin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 0.05 M sodium citrate (pH 4.5) per day, for 5 consecutive days. Mice whose blood glucose level reached > 350 mg/dl twice within those 5 days were used for further study. All works were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Welfare Committee of Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

  Wound creation and drug application. Two days before wound creation, the backs of the mice were depilated with wax (Super Wacs, Hollywood Cosmetics Co, Tokyo, Japan), and mice with pink skin while in the telogen phase were investigated for further study. After induction of deep anesthesia by isoflurane inhalation, a single wound was created on the dorsum of the mice using an 8-mm skin biopsy punch (Kai Industries Co, Ltd, Gifu, Japan). Immediately after the wound creation, 10 mg of petroleum jelly with or without edaravone (Toronto Research Chemicals Inc, Toronto, Canada) comprising a mixture of 30 mg of edaravone and 970 mg of petroleum jelly was applied to the wounds and covered with a semipermeable polyurethane dressing (Opsite, Smith & Nephew, St. Petersburg, FL,). Edaravone or petroleum jelly alone was applied to the wound on day 0 and day 4 after wound creation.

   Wound closure measurements. Wound healing was recorded by a digital camera (Nikon D3200, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) on days 0, 4, and 7 after wound creation. The images were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Insitutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) by tracing the wound margin and calculating the pixel area individually. Wound closure was calculated as follows:

  Wound closure (%) =
  [(area on day 0 – area on indicated day) closure (%)
  / area on day 0] × 100

  Histological study. Wounds were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin, cut into 3-µm sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

  Wound vascularity and lymphangiogenesis. On day 7, the wounds were harvested, fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin, and stained with anti-vWF antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or LYVE-1 antibody (ReliaTech GmbH, Wolfenbüttel, Germany). Nuclei were counterstained with 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope (All-in-One Fluorescence Microscope, BZ-9000 series, Biorevo, Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Cells that were positive for both vWF/LYVE-1 and DAPI and that formed lumens were counted at a high-power (×400).

  Immunohistochemistry. On day 7, the wounds were harvested, fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution, and embedded in paraffin. Immunohistochemistry was performed for sections with polyclonal rabbit anti-eNOS/NOS type III (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and secondary antibodies using avidin-biotin complex/diaminobenzidine histochemistry.

  RNA isolation and microarray analysis for nitric oxide signaling pathway. On day 7, the wounds were excised and total RNA was homogenized in an RNA isolation reagent (TRIzol, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). From the isolated total RNA, cDNA was synthesized and microarray analysis was performed using pathway focused gene expression analysis (Nitric Oxide Signaling Pathway RT2 Profiler PCR Array, PAMM-062Z, Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

  Validation of expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. On day 7, total RNA was isolated in an RNA isolation reagent and cDNA was synthesized by a cDNA reverse transcription kit (High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Quantitative PCR was performed using a real-time PCR (qPCR) kit (SYBR Premix Ex Taq II, Takara, Shiga, Japan) and instrument (LightCycler, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The following oligonucleotides were used: β-actin (Takara, Shiga, Japan): 5’-CATCCGTAAAGACCTCTATGCCAAC-3’, 5’-ATGGAGCCACCGATCCACA-3’; Nos3 (Takara, Shiga, Japan): 5’-ATTCTGGCAAGACAGACTACACGA-3’, 5’-TCCCGGTAGAGATGGTCCAG-3’; VEGF-A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO): 5’-AAAGGCTTCAGTGTGGTCTGAGAG-3’, 5’-GGTTGGAACCGGCATCTTTATC-3’; VEGF-C (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO): 5’-CCAGCACAGGTTACCTCAGCAA-3’, 5’-TAGACATGCACCGGCAGGAA-3’; C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (Takara, Shiga, Japan): 5’-CCCGAAATTAAAGTGGATCCAAGAG-3’, 5’-GCGAGTTACAAAGCGCCAGAG-3’; and fibroblast growth factor 2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO): 5’-CCTCTCAGAGACCTACGTTCAA-3’, 5’-GGAGGTCAAGGCCACAAT-3’.

Statistical Analysis

  Statistical analysis was carried out using software (Prism 5, GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, CA), a 2-tailed Student’s t test, and the Mann–Whitney U test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

  Topical application of edaravone accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice. Full-thickness wounds were created on the backs of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, and edaravone (n = 24) or petroleum jelly (n = 15) was applied on days 0 and 4 after wound creation. Wound healing was examined on days 0, 4, and 7 (Figure 1a). On day 7, the rate of wound closure was significantly greater in mice treated with edaravone than in mice treated with petroleum jelly, 68% and 55%, respectively (P < 0.01) (Figure 1b). Histologically, more abundant blood vessels were observed in the edaravone-treated wound sites than in the control wound sites (Figure 1c, magnified yellow squares).

   Edaravone promotes neovascularization and lymphangiogenesis. To further investigate the number of blood vessels, wound angiogenesis was assessed by immunostaining of the endothelial cell-specific marker von Willebrand factor (vWF) on day 7. Some small vessels were found in the margin of the wound in petroleum jelly-treated mice. However, many more vessels were found in edaravone-treated mice, and they were located in the center of the wound (Figure 2a). Edaravone significantly promoted wound vascularity (Figure 2b). Lymphangiogenesis was also assessed by immunostaining of the lymphatic endothelial cell-specific marker lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) on day 7 (Figure 3a). Edaravone significantly promoted lymphangiogenesis as indicated by LYVE-1 immunostaining (Figure 3b).

   Topical application of edaravone induces endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in endothelial cells. Edaravone reportedly induces eNOS in the ischemic spinal cord in rabbits.10 Therefore, comparative analysis of nitric oxide (NO) signaling gene expression was performed to further investigate the effect of edaravone on neovascularization. The microarray results revealed that 7 genes showed higher expression in edaravone-treated skin on day 7 than in controls, including eNOS (Table 1). In quantitative PCR, there was a statistically significant difference in the relative expression of eNOS on day 7 between the edaravone and control groups (P < 0.01). Moreover, edaravone induced more eNOS-positive cells, which form lumen constructs (Figure 4).

   Edaravone induces expression of stromal cell-derived factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor C, but not vascular endothelial growth factor A. Next, the inducers of edaravone in vasculogenesis and lymphangiogenesis were analyzed. Quantitative PCR was performed on day 7 to investigate candidate angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis genes that resulted in the upregulation of eNOS in edaravone-treated wounds. Edaravone induced the expression of stromal cell-derived factor 1a (SDF-1a), a chemokine that promotes the homing of EPCs, and vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C). Vascular endothelial growth factor -A was expressed at a lower level in edaravone-treated wounds on day 7 (Figure 5).

Discussion

  The principal finding is that edaravone promotes neovascularization and increases the expression of eNOS mRNA and protein in wounds of diabetic mice. As previously reported, edaravone is a free radical scavenger that possesses antioxidant characteristics.11-14 In addition, it upregulates eNOS10,15,16 and NO.17 These reports indicate that neovascularization occurs by quenching the ROS in wounds and increasing the NO concentration, leading to the more rapid wound healing in the current study.

  Vasculogenesis in wounds requires the homing of EPCs to the wound followed by mobilization of EPCs from the bone marrow.18 Reduced numbers and impaired functions of EPCs have been described in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.19,20 The mechanisms responsible for damage to EPCs have not been elucidated, but Gallagher et al21 showed that the levels of both phosphorylated eNOS protein in bone marrow and SDF-1a expression in epithelial cells and myofibroblasts were decreased in diabetic mice. Once in circulation, homing occurs by binding between the C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 on EPCs with SDF-1a in the peripheral area. Furthermore, hypoxic microenvironments such as wounds are suggested to induce the production of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in endothelial cells, resulting in the expression of SDF-1 a in epithelial cells.22,23 In diabetic mice, mobilization and homing are typically disrupted because phosphorylation of eNOS in bone marrow EPCs is impaired and expression of SDF-1 a is decreased.21 This study demonstrated that edaravone increases SDF-1 a expression in wounds, and this may enhance homing. Similar to vasculogenesis, eNOS is indispensable for angiogenesis. Angiogenesis of eNOS knockout mice is reportedly impaired in ischemic environments.24 Moreover, NO produced by eNOS was demonstrated to play a crucial role in endothelial migration and proliferation in vitro.25 The authors believe edaravone modulates angiogenesis by increasing NO production via eNOS.

   Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potent inducer of angiogenesis. The angiogenic effect of VEGF can be modified by VEGF-activated eNOS in endothelial cells.24,26,27 Moreover, phosphorylation of VEGF receptor 2 reportedly activates eNOS,28-31 and several pathways are involved, including Akt/PKB, Ca2+/calmodulin, and protein kinase C.32 In contrast, among a number of angiogenic stimuli, NO regulates VEGF expression. Some groups have reported that NO downregulates VEGF expression,33-36 while others demonstrated upregulation37-39; it has been concluded that the amount of released NO, environmental oxygen tension, and cell types contribute to these conflicting results.32 Thus, the lower level of VEGF expression in edaravone-treated mice in this study does not necessarily reflect lower angiogenesis activity, which could have been the result of reciprocal regulation between NO produced by eNOS and VEGF. Although the association between NO and neovascularization has been extensively investigated, less information is available about the effects of NO on other facets of wound healing (ie, inflammation, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, collagen synthesis, and contraction).40 Cytokines represent other candidates for future investigation because similar to VEGF-A, cytokines can induce NO production, and NO can in turn modulate cytokine production.41

  Notably, topical application of edaravone promoted lymphangiogenesis in this study. Although NO derived from eNOS had a direct lymphatic effect, its role in lymphatic endothelial cells is unclear.42 Stimulation of VEGF receptor 2 and/or 3 in lymphatic endothelial cells can lead to PI3K-dependent activation of eNOS. Conversely, NO reportedly stimulates lymphatic endothelial cell proliferation and/or survival in vitro.43 Statins (HMG CoA reductase inhibitors) have been shown to have beneficial effects (eg, stimulation of angiogenesis and activation of eNOS) that are independent of their cholesterol-lowering effects.44 Interestingly, topical simvastatin stimulates lymphangiogenesis by recovering macrophage function and preventing apoptosis.45 VEGF-C, produced mainly by macrophages, has an important effect on lymphangiogenesis in ischemic and diabetic conditions.5,46

Conclusion

  From the results of the previous reports and the finding that edaravone increased VEGF-C expression in the present report, it is tempting to surmise that edaravone provides a favorable environment for lymphangiogenesis (eg, affecting macrophage functions).

  In one study, streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice demonstrated increased levels of superoxide.47 It was proposed that increased cutaneous superoxide levels contribute to reduced NO bioavailability and loss of functional wound healing.48 In accordance with this, edaravone accelerates wound healing. However, whether edaravone simultaneously scavenges superoxide and induces increased eNOS expression or the increased eNOS expression is dependent upon achieving balance of the redox state of the wound environment remains to be elucidated.

  The simple application of edaravone could accelerate wound healing via angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in patients with diabetes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Takako Ogata and Hisayo Kanamaru for their excellent technical assistance.

The authors are from the Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Address correspondence to:
Shohta Kodama, MD, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Regenerative Medicine & Transplantation
Faculty of Medicine
Fukuoka University
7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku
Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
skodama@fukuoka-u.ac.jp

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by intramural funds of Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

References

1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047-1053. 2. Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1736-1743. 3. Capla JM, Grogan RH, Callaghan MJ, et al. Diabetes impairs endothelial progenitor cell-mediated blood vessel formation in response to hypoxia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):59-70. 4. Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(9):1058-1070. 5. Saaristo A, Tammela T, Farkkila A, et al.Vascular endothelial growth factor-C accelerates diabetic wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(3):1080-1087. 6. Paupert J, Sounni NE, Noel A. Lymphangiogenesis in post-natal tissue remodeling: lymphatic endothelial cell connection with its environment. Mol Aspects Med. 2011;32(2):146-158. 7. Maruyama K, Asai J, Ii M, Thorne T, Losordo DW, D’Amore PA. Decreased macrophage number and activation lead to reduced lymphatic vessel formation and contribute to impaired diabetic wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(4):1178-1191. 8. Watanabe T, Tahara M, Todo S. The novel antioxidant edaravone: from bench to bedside. Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;26(2):101-114. 9. Kikuchi K, Takeshige N, Miura N, et al. Beyond free radical scavenging: Beneficial effects of edaravone (Radicut) in various diseases (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2012;3(1):3-8. 10. Takahashi G, Sakurai M, Abe K, Itoyama Y, Tabayashi K. MCI-186 prevents spinal cord damage and affects enzyme levels of nitric oxide synthase and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase after transient ischemia in rabbits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1461-1466. 11. Higashi Y, Jitsuiki D, Chayama K, Yoshizumi M. Edaravone (3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one), a novel free radical scavenger, for treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2006;1(1):85-93. 12. Anzai K, Furuse M, Yoshida A, et al. In vivo radioprotection of mice by 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (edaravone; Radicut), a clinical drug. J Radiat Res. 2004;45(2):319-323. 13. Yamamoto T, Yuki S, Watanabe T, Mitsuka M, Saito KI, Kogure K. Delayed neuronal death prevented by inhibition of increased hydroxyl radical formation in a transient cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 1997;762(1-2):240-242. 14. Nomoto N. Inhibitory effect of free radical scavenger, MCI-186, in the increase of hydroxyl radical induced by iminodipropionitrile in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2004;219(1-2):41-44. 15. Zhang XH, Matsuda N, Jesmin S, et al. Normalization by edaravone, a free radical scavenger, of irradiation-reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;476(1-2):131-137. 16. Yoshida H, Sasaki K, Namiki Y, Sato N, Tada N. Edaravone, a novel radical scavenger, inhibits oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and reverses oxidized LDL-mediated reduction in the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Atherosclerosis. 2005;179(1):97-102. 17. Jitsuiki D, Higashi Y, Goto C, et al. Effect of edaravone, a novel free radical scavenger, on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in smokers. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94(8):1070-1073. 18. Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1219-1222. 19. Loomans CJ, de Koning EJ, Staal FJ, et al. Endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction: a novel concept in the pathogenesis of vascular complications of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(1):195-199. 20. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, et al. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation. 2002;106(22):2781-2786. 21. Gallagher KA, Liu ZJ, Xiao M, et al. Diabetic impairments in NO-mediated endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and homing are reversed by hyperoxia and SDF-1 alpha. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1249-1259. 22. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, et al. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med. 2004;10(8):858-864. 23. Aicher A, Heeschen C, Mildner-Rihm C, et al. Essential role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells. Nat Med. 2003;9(11):1370-1376. 24. Murohara T, Asahara T, Silver M, et al. Nitric oxide synthase modulates angiogenesis in response to tissue ischemia. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(11):2567-2578. 25. Lee PC, Salyapongse AN, Bragdon GA, et al. Impaired wound healing and angiogenesis in eNOS-deficient mice. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(4 Pt 2):H1600-1608. 26. Papapetropoulos A, Garcia-Cardena G, Madri JA, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide production contributes to the angiogenic properties of vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(12):3131-3139. 27. Parenti A, Morbidelli L, Cui XL, et al. Nitric oxide is an upstream signal of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase1/2 activation in postcapillary endothelium. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(7):4220-4226. 28. Kroll J, Waltenberger J. VEGF-A induces expression of eNOS and iNOS in endothelial cells via VEGF receptor-2 (KDR). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;252(3):743-746. 29. He H, Venema VJ, Gu X, Venema RC, Marrero MB, Caldwell RB. Vascular endothelial growth factor signals endothelial cell production of nitric oxide and prostacyclin through flk-1/KDR activation of c-Src. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(35):25130-25135. 30. Feng Y, Venema VJ, Venema RC, Tsai N, Caldwell RB. VEGF induces nuclear translocation of Flk-1/KDR, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and caveolin-1 in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256(1):192-197. 31. Thuringer D, Maulon L, Frelin C. Rapid transactivation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor KDR/Flk-1 by the bradykinin B2 receptor contributes to endothelial nitric-oxide synthase activation in cardiac capillary endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(3):2028-2032. 32. Kimura H, Esumi H. Reciprocal regulation between nitric oxide and vascular endothelial growth factor in angiogenesis. Acta Biochim Pol. 2003;50(1):49-59. 33. Tsurumi Y, Murohara T, Krasinski K, et al. Reciprocal relation between VEGF and NO in the regulation of endothelial integrity. Nat Med. 1997;3(8):879-886. 34. Liu Y, Christou H, Morita T, Laughner E, Semenza GL, Kourembanas S. Carbon monoxide and nitric oxide suppress the hypoxic induction of vascular endothelial growth factor gene via the 5’ enhancer. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(24):15257-15262. 35. Sogawa K, Numayama-Tsuruta K, Ema M, Abe M, Abe H, Fujii-Kuriyama Y. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activity by nitric oxide donors in hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(13):7368-7373. 36. Huang LE, Willmore WG, Gu J, Goldberg MA, Bunn HF. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation by carbon monoxide and nitric oxide. Implications for oxygen sensing and signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:9038-9044. 37. Kimura H, Weisz A, Kurashima Y, et al. Hypoxia response element of the human vascular endothelial growth factor gene mediates transcriptional regulation by nitric oxide: control of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activity by nitric oxide. Blood. 2000;95(1): 189-197. 38. Kimura H, Weisz A, Ogura T, et al. Identification of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 ancillary sequence and its function in vascular endothelial growth factor gene induction by hypoxia and nitric oxide. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(3):2292-2298. 39. Dulak J, Jozkowicz A, Dembinska-Kiec A, et al. Nitric oxide induces the synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor by rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(3):659-666. 40. Soneja A, Drews M, Malinski T. Role of nitric oxide, nitroxidative and oxidative stress in wound healing. Pharmacol Rep. 2005;57(suppl):108-119. 41. Schwentker A, Vodovotz Y, Weller R, Billiar TR. Nitric oxide and wound repair: role of cytokines? Nitric Oxide. 2002;7(1):1-10. 42. Hagendoorn J, Padera TP, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Molecular regulation of microlymphatic formation and function: role of nitric oxide. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2005;15(5):169-173. 43. Lahdenranta J, Hagendoorn J, Padera TP, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase mediates lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69(7):2801-2808. 44. Kureishi Y, Luo Z, Shiojima I, et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin activates the protein kinase Akt and promotes angiogenesis in normocholesterolemic animals. Nat Med. 2000;6(9):1004-1010. 45. Asai J, Takenaka H, Hirakawa S, et al. Topical simvastatin accelerates wound healing in diabetes by enhancing angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2012;181(6):2217-2224. 46. Kuwahara G, Nishinakamura H, Kojima D, Tashiro T, Kodama S. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C derived from CD11b(+) cells induces therapeutic improvements in a murine model of hind limb ischemia. . 2013;57(4):1090-1099. 47. Luo JD, Wang YY, Fu WL, Wu J, Chen AF. Gene therapy of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and manganese superoxide dismutase restores delayed wound healing in type 1 diabetic mice. Circulation. 2004;110(16):2484-2493. 48. Luo JD, Chen AF. Nitric oxide: a newly discovered function on wound healing. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005;26(3):259-264.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement