Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Relying on What We Know and Learning From Experience

March 2020

Recent events and emerging data are especially concerning to health care
providers. In 2003, 20% of all confirmed persons with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) were health care workers; in Canada, that number was 43%.1 Then, and now with the Corona Virus (COVID-19), we look to the World Health Organization (WHO) and agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for answers to a myriad of questions and for information on how they will help contain, and eventually stop, the spread of the virus.

Although the mortality rate of COVID-19 is lower than that of SARS,
the former spreads much more easily. The mortality rate of COVID-19 is estimated to range from 1% to 2.3%,2 but 1 descriptive study3 reports a rate of 11%; the SARS mortality rate was 9.6%.2 For perspective, the global mortality rate of seasonal influenza is estimated to be approximately
2.1 per 100 000 cases.4

Even though a prompt global response  was generally credited for limiting the SARS epidemic, both the WHO and CDC are currently experiencing immense financial stress.5 Appropriations for CDC funding are approximately 10% lower than 2016 funding levels, in 2018 the White House disbanded its global health security team, and epidemic prevention
activities were curtailed in 39 out of 49 countries (including China) while $1.35 billion was cut over 10 years from the CDC’s Prevention and Public Health Fund.6,7 In the meantime, the WHO has been consistently underfunded. In the early 1980s, voluntary contribution dues from member states (the main source of support for WHO) were frozen, and a
zero-real growth policy was adopted. For 2021, the United States’ administration is proposing to cut its annual funding to WHO by 50%.8

Public health always has been the victim of its own successes. When immunizations are effective and the rates of a communicable diseases go down, their perceived threat diminishes along with the perceived importance of vaccinations. But scientists have long warned about increased risk of epidemics due to infectious pathogens “spilling over from animals to humans,” the development of antimicrobial resistance, the spread of infectious disease through global travel and trade, and a weak public health infrastructure. Unfortunately, measures to address these risks, such as improving our public health infrastructure and hiring qualified scientists, take time.

As such, health care facilities are doing all they can by providing personal protective equipment (PPE) and training, dispensing hand sanitizers and masks to visitors, and issuing regular updates for all employees. The situation is fluid, changing daily, and dependent on your geographical location.

We all need to be as vigilant as possible. We are ever grateful for the health care providers, scientists, and agencies on the front lines who care for infected persons and look for ways to prevent disease spread. Let’s hope the lessons learned from this and other similar events will not be forgotten. The importance of preparedness cannot be understated. You cannot wait to fix the fire truck until there is a fire. It needs to be ready to go.

References

1.    Branswell H. Ten years later, SARS still haunts survivors and health-care workers. The Globe and Mail website.  http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/ten-years-later-sars-still-haunts-survivors-and-health-care-workers/article9363178/. Published March 6, 2013. Updated May 11, 2018.  February 23, 2020.
2.    Woodward A. The new coronavirus has killed nearly 3 times as many people in 8 weeks as SARS did in 8 months. Here’s how the 2 outbreaks compare. Business Insider website. http://www.businessinsider.com/china-wuhan-coronavirus-compared-to-sars-2020-1. Published February 20, 2020. Accessed February 23, 2020.3.    Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513.
4.    Paget J, Spreeuwenberg P, Charu V, et al and for the Global Seasonal Influenza-associated Mortality Collaborator Network and GLaMOR Collaborating Teams. Global mortality associated with seasonal influenza epidemics: new burden estimates and predictors from the GLaMOR Project. J Global Health. 2019;89(2):020421.
5.    Reddy SK, Mazhar S, Lencucha R. The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals. Global Health. 2018;119(2018).
6.    Sun LH. CDC to cut by 80 percent efforts to prevent global disease outbreak. The Washington Post website. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/02/01/cdc-to-cut-by-80-percent-efforts-to-prevent-global-disease-outbreak/. Published February 1, 2018. Accessed February 23, 2020.
7.    Yeager A. Cuts to prevention and public health fund puts CDC programs at risk. The Scientist website. https:// www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/cuts-to-prevention-and-public-health-fund-puts-cdc-programs-at-risk-30298. Published February 9, 2018. Accessed February 23, 2020.
8.    Gramer R. Trump seeks to halve US funding for World Health Organization as Coronavirus rages. Foreign Policy website. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/10/trump-world-health-organization-funding-coronavirus-state-department-usaid-budget-cuts/. Published February 10, 2020. Accessed February 23, 2020..
9.    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Global Health Protection. Why it matters: the pandemic threat. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fieldupdates/winter-2017/why-it-matters.html. Accessed February 23, 2020.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement