Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Clinical Images

Transarterial Chemoembolization as a Mechanism to Downstage Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transplant Eligibility

Abstract

We present a 63-year-old man diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. He was deemed an appropriate liver transplant candidate, but currently outside Milan criteria, as the tumor was >5 cm in its largest dimension. The patient was referred to Interventional Radiology for consideration of transarterial chemoembolization as a mechanism to downstage the patient into transplant eligibility.

IO Learning. 2021;9:E21-E23. Epub 2021 October 20.

Key words: hepatocellular carcinoma, orthotopic liver transplantation

Case Presentation

A 63-year-old man with a past medical history of hepatitis C and heavy alcohol use originally presented to the emergency department with altered mental status. At that time, his relevant labs included albumin of 3.7 g/dL, total bilirubin of 1.6 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase of 122 IU/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 25 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 40 IU/L, platelet count of 66,000/µL, international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.33, and quantitative hepatitis C viral load (HCV Quant) of 73,800 IU/mL. An abdominal ultrasound demonstrated abdominal ascites, a cirrhotic morphology of the liver, and an echogenic mass in the right lobe of the liver. Hepatology admitted the patient for evaluation, and discharged the patient on lactulose once the encephalopathy had improved. As an outpatient, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that confirmed the diagnosis of hepatocellulcar carcinoma (HCC) in the right lobe of the liver (Figure 1). At this point, he was referred to the multidisciplinary liver tumor board for therapeutic options. The patient was deemed to be an appropriate liver transplant candidate but currently outside Milan criteria,1 as the tumor was >5 cm in its largest dimension. Thus, the patient was referred to Interventional Radiology (IR) for consideration of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a mechanism to downstage the patient into transplant eligibility.

Gunn TACE Bridge

Procedure

The right groin was prepared and draped in standard sterile fashion. Moderate conscious sedation using fentanyl and midazolam was employed. After local lidocaine, the right common femoral artery was accessed under sonographic guidance using a needle. Over a wire, a vascular sheath was placed into the artery and attached to a heparinized saline flush. A diagnostic Simmons 2 catheter (Terumo Corporation) was used to catheterize the superior mesenteric artery. Angiography demonstrated no hepatic supply and a patent portal vein. The diagnostic catheter was then used to perform angiography of the celiac artery, which demonstrated classic arterial anatomy. A 2.8 Fr Progreat microcatheter (Terumo Corporation) was advanced into the right hepatic artery, where angiography was repeated (Figure 2), demonstrating the hypervascular tumor. The microcatheter was advanced into the artery supplying segment 7 of the liver. After confirmatory angiography, TACE was performed. The chemoembolic emulsion included 4 mL of doxorubicin 50 mg mixed with approximately 6 mL of ethiodized oil. After delivery of the entire emulsion, bland embolization of the artery was performed to stasis using 100-300 µm Embosphere microspheres (Merit Medical). Repeat angiography demonstrated no additional flow to the tumor. Catheters and wires were removed. The arteriotomy was closed with a MynxGrip closure device (Cordis Corporation). The patient was discharged to home approximately 3 hours after the procedure. Follow-up MRI performed approximately 4-6 weeks after the procedure demonstrated a complete response to therapy (Figure 3).

Gunn TACE Bridge Fig 2

Gunn TACE Bridge Fig 3

Discussion

HCC is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with the majority of cases occurring in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis, autoimmune disorders, alcohol use, or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.2 Overall survival for patients with HCC is significantly improved if they can undergo orthotopic liver transplantation, with 5-year survival rates reaching 60%-80% in patients with early-stage disease.3-6 According to the Milan criteria,1 patients with HCC are eligible for a transplant if they have a single tumor ≤5 cm in size or up to 3 tumors all ≤3 cm in size, although other factors including comorbidities, age, substance abuse, and psychosocial factors are also considered when assessing transplant candidacy.

IR has several image-guided, minimally invasive procedures that can help bridge transplant-eligible patients and downstage near-transplant-eligible patients, including percutaneous ablation, conventional TACE (as performed here), bland transarterial embolization (TAE), drug-eluting bead chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90.7-9 In this case, the patient’s tumor burden placed them outside Milan criteria prior to any intervention. On follow-up, there was a complete response to therapy, thus downstaging the patient to transplant eligibility based on tumor burden. Current guidelines require the patient to maintain eligibility with respect to tumor burden for 6 months prior to being listed for orthotopic liver transplantation. This allows for patients with unfavorable tumor biology or micrometastatic disease to manifest before undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. During this waiting period, patients can undergo local resection, ablation, TACE, TAE, TARE, or radiation as necessary.

Affiliations and Disclosures

From 1Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma; 2the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and 3the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Disclosure: The authors have completed and returned the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Gunn is a speaker for Terumo; speaker and consultant for Boston Scientific and Varian; and receives research support from Penumbra. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest regarding the content herein.

Address for Correspondence: Andrew J. Gunn, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, NHB 623, Birmingham, AL 35249. Email: agunn@uabmc.edu

References

1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693-699.

2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-E386.

3. Bruix J, Reig M, Sherman M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:835-853.

4. Amado V, Rodriguez-Peralvarez M, Ferrin M, De la Mata M. Selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation: incorporating tumor biology criteria. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2018;6:1-10.

5. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182-236.

6. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2016;64:433-485.

7. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379:1245-1255.

8. Pesapane F, Nezami N, Patella F, Geschwind JF. New concepts in embolotherapy of HCC. Med Oncol. 2017;34:58.

9. Molvar C, Lewandowski RJ. Intra-arterial therapies for liver masses: data distilled. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53:973-984.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement