Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Safe Tummy Tuck: Anatomy and Strategy to Avoid Injury to the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve During Abdominoplasty

Publisher:Open Science Company, LLC
S. Chowdhry, MD, J. Davis, MD, T. Boyd, MD, J. Choo, MD, R. M. Brooks, MD, S. S. Kelishadi, MD, J. P. Tutela, MD, D. Yonick, MD, and B. J. Wilhelmi, MD
June 2015
Safe Tummy Tuck: Anatomy and Strategy to Avoid Injury to the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve During Abdominoplasty
S. Chowdhry, MD, J. Davis, MD, T. Boyd, MD, J. Choo, MD, R. M. Brooks, MD, S. S. Kelishadi, MD, J. P. Tutela, MD, D. Yonick, MD, and B. J. Wilhelmi, MD

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky


Correspondence: Sachowdhry22@gmail.com
Keywords: abdominoplasty, safety, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, plastic surgery, tummy tuck

Background: Abdominoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed in the United States. While poor contour and unsatisfactory cosmetic result have been recognized, neuropathic pain from lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury has been poorly described. We aim to improve outcomes by using an anatomical study to develop a strategy to avoid injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in abdominoplasty. Methods: Twenty-three fresh cadaver abdomens were dissected to evaluate the course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, using 2.5× loupe magnification. Measurements were taken from the nerve to the anterior superior iliac spine and from the pubic symphysis to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Recordings of the relationship of the nerve to the inguinal ligament and depth at scarpa's fascia were also made. Statistical analysis was performed to find average distances with a standard deviation. Results: On average, the distance from the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve to the anterior superior iliac spine was 3.62 (SD = 1.32) cm and 13.58 (SD = 2.41) cm from the pubic symphysis in line with the inguinal ligament. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was found at the inguinal ligament 80% of the time and 20% of the time superior to the ligament and always deep to scarpa's fascia. Conclusion: Abdominoplasty carries a high patient and surgeon satisfaction rate. The plastic surgeon is continuously challenged to identify ways to improve outcomes, efficiency, and morbidity. Minimal and careful dissection in the area around 4 cm of the anterior superior iliac spine in addition to preserving scarpa's fascia near the inguinal ligament may serve as key strategies to avoiding lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury.


Abdominoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed in the United States today. Close to 150,000 procedures were performed in 2010, which is almost 3 times the volume performed in 1997.1 As the fourth most commonly performed cosmetic procedure, the plastic surgeon needs to be familiar with not only methods to produce an aesthetically pleasing result but also its potential complications. While poor contour, deformity, and unsatisfactory cosmetic result have been recognized, neuropathic pain from lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury has been poorly described. The importance of this injury has been demonstrated to be significant by patients due to the constant neuropathic pain.

As this complication has the potential for a significantly compromised outcome, the authors outline a study to improve surgical safety. Through identifying a potential complication of a common procedure, this study aims to improve patient quality of life by using an anatomical study to develop a strategy to avoid injury to the LFCN in abdominoplasty surgery.

METHODS

At the University of Louisville Fresh Tissue Lab, 25 cadaver hemiabdomens were dissected to evaluate the course of the LFCN, using 2.5× loupe magnification. Measurements were taken from the nerve to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and from the pubic symphysis (PS) to the LFCN. Recordings of the relationship of the nerve to the inguinal ligament and depth at scarpa's fascia were also made. These data were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed to find average distances with a standard deviation (Figs 1 and 2).

Figure 1. Dissection of the left LFCN showing distance from ASIS (red pin) to LFCN (blue pin). LFCN indicates lateral femoral cutaneous nerve; ASIS, anterior superior iliac spine.
Figure 2. Dissection of bilateral LFCNs showing distance from the pubic symphysis to LFCN and ASIS to LFCN. LFCN indicates lateral femoral cutaneous nerve; ASIS, anterior superior iliac spine.

RESULTS

On average, the distance from the LFCN to the ASIS was 3.62 (SD = 1.32) cm and 13.58 (SD = 2.41) cm from the PS in line with the inguinal ligament (Table 1). The LFCN was found at the inguinal ligament 80% of the time and 20% of the time superior to the ligament and always deep to scarpa's fascia.

Table 1. Distances from ASIS to LFCN at the level of the inguinal ligament and the distance from PS to LFCNa
Cadaver # Gender Side LFCN-ASIS LFCN-PS
1 M L 3.5 12.5
2 M R 4 12.9
3 M L 2.4 12
4 M L 2 12
5 M R 2 11.2
6 M L 3 13.6
7 M R 3 15.1
8 M L 2 17
9 F R 2 16.5
10 M R 4 13.1
11 F L 3 13.5
12 F R 5 13
13 M R 6.8 19.7
14 M L 3 14.5
15 M R 2.3 16.5
16 F L 4 11
17 F R 4.5 12.5
18 F L 4.5 12.5
19 M R 6.5 8.5
20 F R 5 15.5
21 M L 3.5 14.5
22 M R 4.5 16.5
23 M R 3.5 12
24 F L 2.5 11.8
25 F R 4 11.7
Average 3.62 13.58
SD 1.32 2.41
n 25 25
Distances from the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) to the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) at the level of the Inguinal Ligament and the distance from the Pubic Symphasis (PS) to the LFCN.

DISCUSSION

Aesthetic abdominoplasty procedures aim to flatten the abdomen through excision of excess skin and fat while contouring the torso through fascial plication. Concomitant liposuction has been shown to be a safe and effective adjunct to traditional abdominoplasty.2-5

Complications of abdominoplasty range from embolic events to wound complications to poor aesthetic outcomes.5-13 Numerous studies have identified techniques to reduce the most common complication secondary to abdominoplasty: seroma formation. While tissue glues and perforator ligation may play a role in reduced seroma formation, progressive tension or quilting sutures and suction drainage seem to have an advantage in seroma reduction.14-17 General medical comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and smoking appear to play an increased role in wound-healing complications.9

Frequently, patients will describe a temporary numbness of their abdominal wall after abdominoplasty. However, as the LFCN innervates the anterior and lateral thigh, injury to this nerve can result in numbness and pain in this dermatomal distribution.

Lateral femoral nerve injury is a known complication of abdominoplasty, as several studies have identified its occurrence in the literature. Although its incidence of occurrence is about 1.36%, this is the most common nerve injury identified with cosmetic abdominoplasty.1,4,10,12,14,18,19 Review of the literature suggests that only 25% of patients who sustain an injury to the LFCN will recover.14,18

As abdominoplasty procedures serve to improve patient quality of life, complications that interfere with that goal are poorly tolerated. While tissue glues, perforator ligation, chemoprophylaxis, drains, and anesthetic adjuncts can aid in reducing many complications of cosmetic abdominal surgery, there is no substitute for anatomical mastery to meet the challenge of minimizing the poorly tolerated complication of LFCN injury.

Topographic landmarks of the ASIS, PS, xiphoid, and fascial system knowledge can aid the surgeon in safely performing common abdominal cosmetic procedures. Minimal and careful dissection in the area around 4 cm of the ASIS in addition to preserving scarpa's fascia near the inguinal ligament may serve as key strategies to avoiding LFCN injury (Fig 3).

Figure 3. Diagram of the unsafe zone of dissection around the anterior superior iliac spine and the inguinal ligament.

Anatomy of the abdominal wall proves to be predictable and elegant. Comprehensive knowledge of neurovascular anatomy, lymphatics, and fascial planes may prove critical to excellent results. Although the incidence of this injury is relatively small, the potential for a significant complication should be outlined by the plastic surgeon in an appropriate preoperative discussion.

CONCLUSION

As one of the most commonly performed procedures, abdominoplasty generally carries a high patient and surgeon satisfaction rate. The plastic surgeon is continuously challenged to identify ways to improve outcomes, efficiency, and morbidity. Knowledge of the location of the LFCN may aid the surgeon in attaining these goals.

REFERENCES

1. Ducic I, Zakaria HM, Felder JM, Arnspiger S. Abdominoplasty-related nerve injuries: systematic review and treatment options. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34:284-97.

2. Hoyos AE, Perez ME, Castillo L. Dynamic definition mini-lipoabdominoplasty combining multilayer liposculpture, fat grafting, and muscular plication. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:545-60.

3. Levesque AY, Daniels MA, Polynice A. Outpatient lipoabdominoplasty: review of the literature and practical considerations for safe practice. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:1021-9.

4. Gmür RU, Banic A, Erni D. Is it safe to combine abdominoplasty with other dermolipectomy procedures to correct skin excess after weight loss?. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:353-7.

5. Chaouat M, Levan P, Lalanne B, Buisson T, Nicolau P, Mimoun M. Abdominal dermolipectomies: early postoperative complications and long-term unfavorable results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1614-8, discussion 1619-23.

6. Weiler J, Taggart P, Khoobehi K. A case for the safety and efficacy of lipoabdominoplasty: a single surgeon retrospective review of 173 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:702-13.

7. Newall G, Ruiz-Razura A, Mentz HA, Patronella CK, Ibarra FR, Zarak A. A retrospective study on the use of a low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboembolism prophylaxis in large-volume liposuction and body contouring procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30:86-95, discussion 96-7.

8. Campbell W, Pierson J, Cohen-Shohet R, Mast BA. Maximizing chemoprophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in abdominoplasty patients with the use of preoperative heparin administration. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S94-6.

9. Iglesias M, Ortega-Rojo A, Garcia-Alvarez MN, et al. Demographic factors, outcomes, and complications in abdominal contouring surgery after massive weight loss in a developing country. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:54-8.

10. Stewart KJ, Stewart DA, Coghlan B, Harrison DH, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:1152-5.

11. Pitanguy I.. Evaluation of body contouring surgery today: a 30-year perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1499-514, discussion 1515-6.

12. van Uchelen JH, Werker PM, Kon M. Complications of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1869-73.

13. Hatef DA, Kenkel JM, Nguyen MQ, et al. Thromboembolic risk assessment and the efficacy of enoxaparin prophylaxis in excisional body contouring surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:269-79.

14. Pollock TA, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty: a review of 597 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:729-42.

15. Skillman JM, Venus MR, Nightingale P, Titley OG, Park A. Ligating perforators in abdominoplasty reduces the risk of seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(2):446-50.

16. Bercial ME, Sabino Neto M, Calil JA, Rossetto LA, Ferreira LM. Suction drains, quilting sutures, and fibrin sealant in the prevention of seroma formation in abdominoplasty: which is the best strategy?. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:370-3.

17. Lee JC, Teitelbaum J, Shajan JK, Naram A, Chao J. The effect of fibrin sealant on the prevention of seroma formation after postbariatric abdominoplasty. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20:178-80.

18. Floros C, Davis PK. Complications and long-term results following abdominoplasty: a retrospective study. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:190-4.

19. al-Qattan MM. Abdominoplasty in multiparous women with severe musculoaponeurotic laxity. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:450-5.

JOURNAL INFORMATION ARTICLE INFORMATION
Journal ID: ePlasty Volume: 15
ISSN: 1937-5719 E-location ID: e22
Publisher: Open Science Company, LLC Published: June 17, 2015

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement