P070 Next Generation Wearable Technology for IBD Patients: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) prevalence is rising. Quality of life (QOL) in chronic illness is affected by various physical and psychosocial factors. Recent studies in other chronic illnesses have used remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) to help predict changes in disease activity and provide opportunities for patient self-management. It has been proposed that bowel inflammation can lead to suboptimal sleep, circadian rhythm disruption and even additional immune system activation. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a validated metric that has been used to predict outcomes and help manage other disease states. To date, there is limited data on the benefit of RPM in IBD care. We wish to explore the potential benefit of the Whoop Strap (new wearable technology device) as a method of RPM for IBD patients. METHODS: We recruited patients with Ulcerative Colitis from our tertiary care IBD center 18 years and older willing to wear the Whoop Strap 3.0 for 12 months with support from the Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 2020 Department of Medicine House Staff Grant; Clinical Trial Identifier is NCT04333810. During this time, participants were encouraged to use the Whoop mobile application to record symptoms. Physiologic metrics of interest included sleep, resting heart rate (RHR), and HRV; each were correlated to IBD related symptoms. Additionally, we performed monthly “check-ins” to collect disease activity (SCCAI), mood (HADS) and stress (PSS4) questionnaire data. Descriptive statistics were utilized along with correlation coefficient testing to explore potential relationships between Whoop metrics, disease activity scores and patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Enrollment is ongoing with 7 participants, one of which was lost to follow up. Of note, 2 patients proactively reached out to communicate concern for an underlying disease flare as they noticed significant change in their Whoop metrics in conjunction with worrying symptoms. Patient 1 subsequently had serologic testing after having increased HRV and elevated RHR several days prior to symptoms; results were consistent with active inflammation exhibiting a rise in C-reactive protein from 0.25 mg/dL in 2020 to 2.82 mg/dL. Fecal calprotectin was also elevated at 566 ug/g. Colonoscopy is scheduled for the near future. Patient 2 also had noticeable HRV and RHR changes alongside significant sleep disturbances, which has prompted additional testing. CONCLUSION: Remote physiologic monitoring is a feasible way to give patients ownership of their medical care and involve them in the diagnostic and treatment process of their underlying IBD. As exhibited with our preliminary results, the Whoop device appears easy to use and may empower patients to reach out to providers even before symptoms occur, leading to an expedited evaluation for increased disease activity. Our feasibility study will hopefully lead to larger prospective efforts utilizing wearable technology devices such as the Whoop in IBD patients.