ADVERTISEMENT
SIRONA Trial @TCT – First Head-to-Head Comparison of Sirolimus Versus Paclitaxel DCBs in the Treatment of PAD: Sirolimus-Coated Balloons Yield Similar Results to Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Femoropopliteal Artery
WASHINGTON, DC – Data from the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated SIRONA randomized clinical trial demonstrated MagicTouch™️ sirolimus-coated balloons to be noninferior compared to paclitaxel-coated balloons with regards to the primary safety and efficacy endpoints in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.
Findings were reported today at TCT 2024, the annual scientific symposium of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF). TCT is the world’s premier educational meeting specializing in interventional cardiovascular medicine.
Whether sirolimus drug-coated balloons (DCB) may have advantages over paclitaxel DCB in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease remains unknown. Researchers aimed to determine if sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. From April 2021 to September 2022, a total of 482 participants with Rutherford category 2 to 4 femoropopliteal artery disease were enrolled at 25 clinical sites in Germany and Austria. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive angioplasty with either a sirolimus-coated balloon or a paclitaxel-coated balloon. Patient characteristics were similar between both groups.
The mean lesion length was 84 ± 61 mm. A total of 34% of the lesions were totally occluded and 29% were calcified according to PACSS (Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System) grade 4. Bailout stents were implanted in 22.8% of the sirolimus group and 20.3% of the paclitaxel group lesions [difference: 2.5% (95%CI: -4.9% to 9.8%)].
The rate of the primary efficacy endpoint of primary patency at 12 months was 73.8% in the sirolimus DCB group compared with 75.0% in the paclitaxel DCB group [Rate difference: -1.2% (-9.7% to 7.4%, p=0.022, non-inferiority)]. The rate of the composite primary safety outcome at 12 months of clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cdTVR), major amputation, or death was 9.4% in the sirolimus DCB versus 7.3% in the paclitaxel DCB [Between-group difference: 2.1% (95%CI: -3.2% to 7.5%, p=0.003, non-inferiority)]. Functional outcomes were similar between the two groups.
“This head-to-head comparison of sirolimus-coated balloons with paclitaxel-coated balloons during angioplasty of the femoropopliteal artery shows comparable results between the two study groups,” said Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA, MME, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena. “Understanding the safety and efficacy of these two types of balloons, especially compared to one another, can help provide the best patient care possible.”
The study was funded by Concept Medical Inc.
Dr. Teichgräber reported the following disclosures: grant/research support from Concept Medical Inc.
Find More:
Cardiovascular Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) Topic Center
The Latest Clinical & Industry News
Grand Rounds With Morton Kern, MD
