Annals of Thoracic Surgery: New Study Shows Excellent Long-Term Survival After SAVR

Using Largest U.S. Database, Study in Low-Risk Patients Reveals 5-Year Survival Rate of 93%

Chicago, Ill. —  A study published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery demonstrates outstanding long-term survival following low-risk isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

The study reviewed 42,586 patients who underwent low-risk isolated SAVR between 2011 and 2019 at 981 different cardiac surgery programs across the U.S. Conducted by eight leading national investigators, the assessment relied on evidence from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database, with linkage to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Death Index (NDI).

The STS National Database, with nearly 10 million patient records, is the nation’s largest and most comprehensive clinical registry for cardiothoracic disease. The linkage to the NDI has permitted highly accurate survival information to now be available following heart and lung operations performed in the U.S.

All patients in the study were classified as low risk for SAVR mortality as defined by the STS predicted risk of operative mortality (PROM ≤ 4%). Overall, 92.9% survived after five years, and the eight-year survival was close to 90%. The study matched the criterion used in the current low-risk trials evaluating SAVR with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The average age of patients was 74.2 years with a mean PROM of 1.92%

“This study sets a benchmark for outcomes for management of aortic valve stenosis,” said Vinod Thourani, MD, Bernie Marcus Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery and the Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia. “This analysis is significant because of the longitudinal follow-up with very large numbers of patients, and it is an important complement to results from randomized clinical trials that are commonly measured over just one year.”

Recent evidence has revealed that SAVR following failed TAVR requiring explant of the TAVR valve, is a growing procedure over the last five years and is associated with worse outcomes than those observed in redo SAVR operations.  

The most recent mid-term results from the PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low-Risk trials comparing risk of death and stroke from SAVR and TAVR are expected to be released in fall 2023. As there have been some concerns raised regarding the representativeness of these trials, the current study was performed to establish real-world long-term results from SAVR to serve as a benchmark for outcomes.

“There remains absolutely no doubt that TAVR is an excellent primary option for patients of higher risk or advanced age. The aim of this study was to specifically evaluate patients of low risk, and this revealed that longitudinal outcomes of SAVR in this specific population are outstanding. As surgeons are consistently performing these surgeries with excellent outcomes, and now in minimally invasive fashion, these data should give providers of valve therapy, including cardiologists and surgeons, a point of reflection when it comes to deciding what the best option is for their patients,” said senior study author Vinay Badhwar, MD, Professor and Chairman of the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery of West Virginia University, and Executive Chair of the WVU Heart and Vascular Institute.

The STS National Database includes 97% of all cardiac operations performed in the U.S. with precise and validated statistical models for patients receiving adult cardiac, general thoracic, and congenital operations.

Study authors also included Robert H. Habib, PhD, Wilson Szeto, MD, Joseph Sabik, MD, Jennifer Romano, MD, MS, and Thomas MacGillivray, MD.

Link to “Survival Following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Contemporary Trial Benchmark:” https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(23)01064-0/fulltext

Find More:

The Latest Clinical & Industry News

Grand Rounds With Morton Kern, MD

Watch: Cath Lab Live Videos

Podcasts: Cath Lab Conversations

Go to Cath Lab Digest's current issue page