Skip to main content

The Missing Link in STEMI Interventions - Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sameer Mehta, MD, FACC, MBA
April 2008

The dots in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) interventions finally get connected through the robust results of the Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (TAPAS), published in the recent edition of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM 2008; 358:557-67; see sidebar). In this landmark randomized trial of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Felix Zijlstra and colleagues report better reperfusion and clinical outcomes than conventional PCI with thrombus aspiration performed with the 6-French Export Aspiration Catheter (Medtronic, Inc., Santa Clara, CA), irrespective of clinical and angiographic characteristics at baseline.
In a total of 1,071 patients that were randomly assigned to the thrombus-aspiration group or the conventional-PCI group, the researchers reported a myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 in 17.1% of the patients in the thrombus-aspiration group and in 26.3% of those in the conventional-PCI group (p<0.0001). In addition, complete resolution of ST-segment elevation occurred in 56.6% and 44.2% of patients respectively (p<0.0001).
Most critically, the TAPAS investigators demonstrated the critical importance of the surrogates of myocardial blush grade (MPG) and ST-segment resolution (STR) as appropriate endpoints. At 30 days, the rate of death in patients with a myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1, 2 and 3 was 5.2%, 2.9% and 1% respectively (p<0.003) and the rate of adverse events was 14.1%, 8.8% and 4.2% respectively (p<0.0001).

Although numerous trials (Table 1) have demonstrated favorable trends in the use of aspiration and thrombectomy devices, TAPAS provides irrefutable benefits of thrombectomy for STEMI lesions. Benefits with thrombus aspiration were seen across the board and thrombus aspiration was better irrespective of the sex, age, total ischemic time, infarct-related vessel or segment, TIMI grade or visible thrombus by angiography.

From our experience in the Single INdividual Community Experience REgistry for Primary PCI (SINCERE) database, we offer a few additional refinements to the superb work from TAPAS:

a. It must be recognized that it may not always be possible to identify thrombus by angiography — it is precisely in dealing with this limitation wherein TAPAS provides rationale for using thrombectomy for all subsets. Yet, not only should every effort be made to demonstrate thrombus, we even suggest trying to determine the thrombus grade.
b. Using the thrombus grade (Table 2) as a baseline, we then suggest a strategy to employ either aspiration or mechanical thrombectomy (Table 3). Although we are committed to universally employing thrombectomy for all STEMI interventions and we find the low-profile and trackability of aspiration catheters extremely beneficial, we also recognize the limitations of these catheters in the presence of bulky thrombus and in treating saphenous vein grafts. For these indications, we strongly feel that mechanical thrombectomy with devices such as the AngioJet (Possis Medical, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), provides even more effective treatment of thrombus.
c. Finally, we offer a few tips from our experience regarding the use of aspiration catheters:


1. These catheters are most effective with fresh clot. Organized thrombus is more resistant to debulking.
2. Various aspiration catheters have different profiles:
a. Different pushability, tractability and aspiration rates.
b. All are 6-French compatible.
c. It is useful to stock and be familiar with the use of at least one.
3. Flush catheter lumen well before use as it facilitates better tracking over the wire.
4. Avoid kinking the catheter — advance slowly over the initial, softer portion of the catheter.
5. Monitor distal tip of the guidewire as the aspiration catheter is advanced — it is not uncommon for the guidewire to advance during this maneuver.
6. Advance the aspiration catheter through the entire length of occlusive disease.
7. Maintain aspiration for longer duration in the dense portion of the thrombus.
8. Maintain aspiration rate by maintaining negative pressure during advancement and withdrawal of the catheter.
9. Watch the guide catheter as aspiration catheter is withdrawn:
a. Anecdotal reports of the guiding catheter getting sucked in.
b. It may cause trauma to proximal vessel (e.g., left main).
c. Consider releasing the negative pressure while withdrawing the catheter.
10. If no suction of blood despite appropriate preparation and lesion selection:
a. The aspiration lumen may be plugged with thrombus. In this case, withdraw and flush the catheter, and repeat the procedure.
11. Additional passes may be needed for bulky thrombus.
12. If thrombus burden is unchanged after two passes with appropriate technique and the vessel anatomy is suitable, consider a switch to the AngioJet.

Portions of this article were reprinted with permission from Mehta S. Chapter 8: Practical Guidelines for Performing STEMI Interventions. In: Mehta S, ed. Textbook of STEMI Interventions. Malvern, PA: HMP Communications, 2008:113-130.

 

References

1. Fischman DL, Savage MP, Leon MB, et al. Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22:1641–1646.
2. Aliabadi D, Tilli FV, Bowers TR, et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:994–997.
3. Poerner TC, Kralev S, Voelker W, et al. Natural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2002; 143:627–635.
4. Crossman AW, D'Agostino HJ, Geraci SA. Timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction: a critical literature review. Clin Cardiol 2002; 25(9):406–410.
5. Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, et al. Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006. 98(1):54–59.
6. Henriques JPS, Zijistra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for AMI. Eur Heart J 2002; 23:1112–1117.
7. Napodano M, Pasquetto G, Sacca S, et al. Intracoronary thrombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1395–1402.
8. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:1033–1035.
9. Lefevre T, Garcia E, Reimers B, et al. X AMINE ST Investigators. X-sizer for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction improves ST-segment resolution: results of the X-sizer in AMI for negligible embolization and optimal ST resolution (X AMINE ST) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:246–252.
10. Burzotta F, Trani C, Romagnoli E, et al. Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombusaspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:371–376.
11. Dudek D, Mielecki W, Legutko J, et al. Percutaneous thrombectomy with the RESCUE system in acute myocardial infarction. Kardiol Pol 2004; 61:523–533.
12. De Luca L, Sardella G, Davidson CJ, et al. Impact of intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy during primary angioplasty on left ventricular remodelling in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart 2006; 92:951–957.
13. Ali A, Cox D, Dib N, et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:244–252.
14. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:1033–1035.


Sources:

1. The TIMI-IIIA Investigators. Early effects of tissue-type plasminogen activator added to conventional therapy on the culprit coronary lesion in patients presenting with ischemic cardiac pain at rest. Circulation 1993;87:38–52.
2. van’t Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation 1998;97: 2302–2306.